马克思“巴黎手稿”的文献学问题再探究(上)

The Further Exploration of “Paris Manuscripts”by Karl Marx ( the first half)

"巴黎手稿"是表征马克思思想的最重要著述之一,但令人遗憾的是,过于功利的"现实"考量和原始文献资料的欠缺,使我们未能全面而客观地把握和理解马克思当时的思想。从"文本学"角度考虑,至今仍有相当多的研究工作尚未展开。本文根据权威的文献材料,并结合笔者的判断,对"巴黎时期"马克思著述和活动情况、"巴黎笔记"与"巴黎手稿"之间的关系、"三个笔记本"与"穆勒评注"的写作顺序、"三个笔记本"不同版本的编排、笔记本Ⅱ大量遗失的内容等五个复杂的文献学问题一一进行了梳理、分析、推测、考察和探佚,以期为进一步的内容解读和思想阐释奠定基础。

＂Paris manuscripts＇by Karl Marx is one of the most important works, but we can not under- stand the Marx~ thought at that time completely and objectively because of the lack of the original text, so we should have a lot of work to do now. This paper sorts out, analyzes, investigates and researches the relationship between ＂Paris notes＂ and ＂Paris manuscripts,, the writing order of ＂three notebooks＂ and ＂comments and notes of Muller＂, different versions of ＂three notebooks＂, the missing contents in the second notebook in order to lay a solid foundation for further reading and explanation.