期刊文献+

土地整理项目区适宜水面率模型 被引量:4

Suitable water surface ratio of land consolidation project areas
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对土地开发整理过程中人为因素的作用使水域面积逐步减少、水域功能退化等问题,分析了国内外相关研究进展,确定了研究目标及内容,并依据水文学和农田灌排基本原理,从防洪、抗旱、除涝和环境等多角度出发,对土地开发整理项目区的产汇流和需水容量进行分析;根据土地开发整理项目所在区域的位置、地形、水系条件等提出土地整理项目区适宜水面率分析模型,结合江苏土地整理项目实际,利用自行开发的分析软件进行分区水面率分析计算,结果表明:赣榆县黑林镇土地整理项目区(丘陵)的适宜水面率为4.71%,江苏省丘陵区土地整理项目平均适宜水面率为5.11%,范围为3.5%~7%;滨海县蔡桥镇土地整理项目区(平原)适宜水面率取8.58%,江苏省平原区土地整理项目平均适宜水面率为7.69%,范围为6%~9%. In the process of explnring and using land, human being's interference has resulted in water surface diminishing, water body's function shrinking and other issues. By studying related researches domestic and abroad, determining research objective and contents, with hydrology and farmland irriga- tion and drainage principles as theoretical bases, from the perspectives of flood-control, drought resis- tance, water logging-drainage and environments, the rainfall-runoff and water demands in land consoli- dation project areas were analyzed. A suitable water surface ratio model was proposed based on diffe- rent locations, terrain conditions and hydrographie nets of land consolidation project areas. Taking the actual situations of Jiungsu land consolidation projects into consideration, the water surface ratios were analyzed and calculated. The results show that the suitable water surface ratio of land consolidation project areas in tteilin Town of Ganyu County ( hilly region) is 4.71% and that of hilly areas in Jiang- su Province is about 5. 11% , ranging from 3.5% to 7%. The suitable water surface ratio of land con- solidation project areas in Caiqiao Town of Binhai County (plain region) is 8.58% and that of Jiangsu Province is 7.69% , ranging from 6% to 9%.
出处 《排灌机械工程学报》 EI 北大核心 2013年第2期180-184,共5页 Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engineering
基金 国土资源部公益性项目(200811088)
关键词 土地整理 水面率 丘陵区 平原区 模型 land consolidation water surface ratio hilly region plain region model
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1王淑英,高永胜,叶碎高,郑加才.合理水面率的研究方法与框架初探[J].水利学报,2007,38(S1):568-572. 被引量:9
  • 2黄义娟.圩区合理水面率及综合整治多层次模糊综合评价[D].南京:河海大学农业工程学院,2009.
  • 3王兵,刘国彬,张光辉,杨勤科,杨艳芬.黄土丘陵区中尺度流域水土流失治理环境效应评估[J].农业机械学报,2012,43(7):28-35. 被引量:15
  • 4Todini E. The ARNO rainfall-runoff model [ J ]. Journal of Hydrology, 1996, 175( 1/2/3/4):339-392.
  • 5Amaud-Fassetta G. River channel changes in the Rhone Delta(France) since the end of the Little Ice Age: Geo- morphological adjustment to hydro climatic change and natural resource management[ J]. Catena, 2003, 51 (2) : 141 - 172.
  • 6Rhonda Y, Brain W, Roy V A. Urban effects on flood plain natural hazards : Wolf river, Tennessee, USA[ J ]. Engineering Geology, 2003,70(1/2) : 1 - 15.
  • 7Lin Kuo-Liang. Determining key ecological indicators for urban land consolidation [ J ]. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 2010, 14 (2) : 89 - 103.
  • 8Salvatore Di Falco, Ivan Penov, Aleksi Aleksiev, et al. Agro biodiversity, farm profits and land fragmentation: Evidence from Bulgaria[ J]. Land Use Policy, 2010, 27 (3) : 763 -771.
  • 9Befit Junker, Matthias Buchecker. Aesthetic preferences versus ecological objectives in river restorations [ J ]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2008, 85 (3/4) : 141 - 154.
  • 10Gopal B Thapa, Gajendra S Niroula. Alternative options of land consolidation in the mountains of Nepal: An a- nalysis based on stakeholders' opinions [ J ]. Land Use Policy, 2008, 25 (3) : 338 - 350.

二级参考文献25

共引文献23

同被引文献28

引证文献4

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部