期刊文献+

基于动态广义费用的客运通道交通方式选择Logit模型 被引量:23

A Dynamic Generalized Cost Based Logit Model for Passenger Corridors
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为更科学计算运输通道各种交通方式供给能力的配置量,运用随机效用理论和离散选择模型,建立基于动态广义费用的交通方式选择Logit模型,以郑州-西安客运通道为实例,运用Matlab软件编写程序,进行求解验证.研究表明,交通方式建设成本分摊随分担量变化而变化,并与随机感知系数和出行时间价值一起影响各方式分担率.与现有模型的对比表明,各方式分担率变化幅度与建设成本大小差异并非同向;交通方式选择的广义费用是动态变化的,不能仅仅依据静态的在途时间和票价进行方式分担率计算.该模型既能保证出行者的个体要求又能保障各种交通方式的持续运营,所计算的通道各交通方式分担率更符合实际. In order to scientifically compute the supply allocation of various transportation modes for passenger corridors, a dynamic generalized transportation cost based logit model is proposed according to the theory of random utility and discrete choice model. The model' s robustness and accuracy were verified via MATLAB programming using the Zhengzhou-Xi' an Passenger Corridor as a study case. The analysis resuh indicates that transportation construction cost changes with the share, which is influenced by travel time and the random perception coefficient. Compared with existing models, the changes of sharing rate and that of transportation construction costs in this paper are not in the same direction. For the dynamic changing of generalized transportation costs, the sharing rate calculated only by a static travel time and ticket price is unreliable. The model proposed in this paper cannot only meet the individual demands of travelers, but can also keep the sustainable operation of transportation. The sharing rates calculated by the model for the Zhengzhou-Xi' an Passenger Corridor are more reasonable than those calculated by traditional models.
出处 《交通运输系统工程与信息》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第4期15-22,共8页 Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology
基金 教育部人文社科项目(10YJC630216) 陕西省外专局留学人员择优资助项目(201234)
关键词 综合交通运输 交通方式选择 LOGIT模型 客运通道 动态广义费用 comprehensive transportation transportation mode choice Logit model passenger corridor dynamic generalized cost
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1贾洪飞,龚勃文,宗芳.交通方式选择的非集计模型及其应用[J].吉林大学学报(工学版),2007,37(6):1288-1293. 被引量:69
  • 2隽志才,李志瑶,宗芳.基于活动链的出行需求预测方法综述[J].公路交通科技,2005,22(6):108-113. 被引量:48
  • 3Train Kenneth E. Discrete choice methods with simulation [ M ]. London : Cambridge University Press, 2001 : 15-37.
  • 4Ben-Akiva, Moshe and Lerman R. Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand a [ M ] . MIT Press Series in Transportation Studies, Cambridge, MA, 1985.
  • 5Chu C. A paired combinatorial logit model for travel demand analysis [ C]. Proceedings of the Fifth World Conference on Transportation Research, 4, Ventura, CA, 1989.
  • 6Koppelman, Frank,Wen C H. The paired combinatorial logit model: properties, estimation and application [ J ] Transportation Research B,2000,34 (2) :75-89.
  • 7Vosha, Perter. Application of Cross-Nested logit model to mode choice in tel aviv, israel, metropolitan area [ J]. Transportation Research Record, 1997, 1607: 6-15.
  • 8Wen C H, Koppelman F S. The generalized nested logit model[J]. Transportation Research B ,2001, 35(7) :627-641.
  • 9Dong X J, Ben-Akiva M, Bowman J, et al. Transformation and comparison of activity-based accessibility across individuals[ R]. Working paper, Department of Civil Engineering , Northwestern University and Department of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2003 a.
  • 10Dong X J, Koppelman F. Comparison of different methods to represent heterogeneity in logit models [ C ]. Presented an International Association Travel Behavior Research Conference, Luzerne,Switzerland, 2003 b.

二级参考文献41

  • 1周国梅,傅小兰.决策的期望效用理论的发展[J].心理科学,2001,24(2):219-220. 被引量:19
  • 2隽志才,李志瑶,宗芳.基于活动链的出行需求预测方法综述[J].公路交通科技,2005,22(6):108-113. 被引量:48
  • 3[1]Avineri E and Prashker J N.Sensitivity to travel time variability:travelers' learning perspective[J].Transportation Research Part C,2005,13 (2):157-183.
  • 4[2]Van Berkum E and Van der Mede P.The impact of traffic infor mation-dynamics in route and departure time choice[M].Delft,Delft University Press,1993.
  • 5[3]Chen A and Recker W.Considering risk taking behavior in travel time reliability[R].Report UCI-ITS-WP-00-24,Institute of Transportation Studies,University of California,Irvine,USA,2000.
  • 6[4]de Palma A and Picard N.Route choice decision under travel time uncertainty[J].Transportation Research Part A,2005,39(4):295-324.
  • 7[5]Bonsall P W.Travelers' response to uncertainty[M] //Bell M G H and Cassir C (Eds.).Reliability of Transport Networks,Research Studies Press Ltd.,UK,2000,1-10.
  • 8[6]Noland R B,Small K A,Koskenoja P M and Chu X H.Simulating travel reliability[J].Regional Science and Urban Economics,1998,28 (5):535-564.
  • 9[7]Noland R B and Polak J.Travel Time variability:a review of theoretical and empirical issues[J].Transport Reviews,2002,22 (1):39-54.
  • 10[8]Tseng Y Y,Ubbels B and VerhoefE.Value of time,schedule delay and reliability[EB/OL].http://www.ersa.org/ersaconfs/eras05/papers/202.pdf,2005.

共引文献120

同被引文献191

引证文献23

二级引证文献129

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部