期刊文献+

铅蓄电池厂污染土壤中重金属铅的清洗及形态变化分析 被引量:6

Analysis of Washing Efficiency and Change in Lead Speciation in Lead-contaminated Soil of a Battery Factory
原文传递
导出
摘要 以我国西南某铅蓄电池厂区内不同污染负荷的铅污染土壤为研究对象,对其中铅含量和形态进行分析,并利用不同清洗剂清洗进行筛选.对不同pH条件下铅的清洗效率和铅形态进行分析,并对不同粒径土壤进行不同时间清洗以确定最佳清洗时间.结果表明,厂区内A和B点土壤污染严重,分别达到15 703.22 mg.kg-1和1 747.78 mg.kg-1,活动态铅比例较大,残渣态仅占17.32%、11.64%、14.6%和10.2%.EDTA、盐酸、柠檬酸、鼠李糖脂和SDS这5种清洗剂中EDTA和盐酸的提取效果最好.酸性条件下的清洗不仅能有效地提取铅总量并能有效地减小铅活动态的环境风险,建议pH 4~7最为合适.粗沙粒和细沙粒的清洗效果较好,清洗粉黏粒建议改进工艺,清洗时间定为240 min效果最好. Lead-contaminated soil with different pollution load in a lead battery factory in the southwest of China was chosen as the research object,the lead content and speciation were analyzed,and different washing agents were screened.The lead washing efficiency and lead speciation were analyzed under different pH conditions,and the soil of different particle size was washed using different duration to determine the best washing time.The results showed that the soil of sites A and B in the factory was severely contaminated,the lead concentration reaching 15 703.22 mg.kg-1 and 1 747.78 mg.kg-1,respectively,and the proportion of the active-state lead was relatively high,while the residue state accounted for only 17.32%,11.64%,14.6% and 10.2%.EDTA and hydrochloric acid showed the best extraction effect in the 5 washing agents tested,which included EDTA,hydrochloric acid,citric acid,rhamnolipid and SDS.Cleaning under acidic conditions could not only effectively extract the total amount of lead but also effectively reduce the environmental risk of active-state lead.pH 4-7 was suggested as the most appropriate condition.The cleaning effect of coarse sand and fine sand was good,while for washing powder clay,it is better to improve the process,with the optimal washing time determined as 240 min.
出处 《环境科学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第9期3697-3703,共7页 Environmental Science
关键词 铅总量 形态 EDTA PH 粒径 清洗时间 lead content chemical speciation EDTA pH particle size duration of washing
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1张胜田,林玉锁,华小梅,徐亦刚,田猛,江希流.中国污染场地管理面临的问题及对策[J].环境科学与管理,2007,32(6):5-7. 被引量:90
  • 2刘清,王子健,汤鸿霄.重金属形态与生物毒性及生物有效性关系的研究进展[J].环境科学,1996,17(1):89-92. 被引量:272
  • 3Williams D E, Vlamis J, Pukite A H, et al. Trace element accumulation, movement, and distribution in the soil profile from massive applications of sewage sludge [ J ]. Soil Science, 1980, 129(2) : 119-132.
  • 4Griffiths R A. Soil-washing technology and practice [ J ]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1995, 40(2) : 175-189.
  • 5Dermont G, Bergeron M, Mercier G, et al. Soil washing for metal removal: A review of physical/chemical technologies and field applications [ J ]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2008, 152(1): 1-31.
  • 6Semer R, Reddy K R. Evaluation of soil washing process to remove mixed contaminants from a sandy loam [ J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1996, 45( 1 ) : 45-57.
  • 7Mulligan C N, Yong R N, Gibbs B F. Surfaetant- enhanced remediation of contaminated soil: a review [ J ].Engineering Geology ,2001,60:371-380.
  • 8Steve P. Brownfield Assessment and Remediation [ R ].Shanghai: UK Seminar on Land Contamination Remediation Technologies, 2006, 3.
  • 9漆静娴,王鹤立.化学萃取技术修复重金属污染土壤[A].2009重金属污染监测、风险评价及修复技术高级研讨会[C].2009.
  • 10Lo I M C, Yang X Y. EDTA extraction of heavy metals from different soil fractions and synthetic soils [ J]. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 1999, 109( 1-4): 219-236.

二级参考文献80

共引文献476

同被引文献92

引证文献6

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部