期刊文献+

腹腔内网片植入法在复发性腹股沟疝再手术中的应用

The application of IPOM in re-operation of recurrent inguinal hernia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨腹腔镜下腹腔内网片植入法(IPOM)在复发性腹股沟疝再手术中的应用价值。方法对2007年1月-12012年1月间收治的159例复发性腹股沟疝患者临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果开放手术78例。平均手术时间(90.4±11.5)分,平均住院时间(6.2±1.3)天,平均住院费用(9101±581)元,术后随访10~59个月6例复发;IPOM手术81例,平均手术时间(25.1±9.5)分;平均住院时间(4.3±0.7)天,平均住院费用(13674±893)元,术后随访10~58个月1例复发;两组患者术后均未出现肠梗阻、窦道形成和肠瘘等严重并发症。结论相比开放手术方式,IPOM在复发性腹股沟疝的再手术中,具有操作简单、复发率低的优点。 Objective . To investigate the value of laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) in re-operation of recurrent inguinal hernia. Methods Clinical datum of 159 male patients who had undergone surgical repair of recurrent ingui- nal hernias from January 2007 through January 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. Results The review showed that 159 pa- tients had undergone either open mesh repair ( n = 78 ) or laparoscopic IPOM repair ( n = 81 ) for recurrent inguinal hernia. 78 cases underwent open mesh repair, and 81 cases received laparoscopic IPOM. Although the overall cost in IPOM group ( 13674 ±893 yuan) was higher than open mesh group (9101 ±581 yuan), mean operation time (90. 4 ±11.5 vs 25.1 ±9. 5 minutes, P = 0. 002) and mean hospital stay (6.2±1.3 vs 4. 3 ±0.7 days, P = 0.03 ) were much longer in open mesh group. There were 1 ( 1.2% ) re-recurrence in IPOM group and 6 (7. 6% ) re-recurrences in open mesh group after 10- 59 months follow up. There were no severe complications in both groups. Conclusion Compared with open mesh repair, laparoscopic IPOM has its own advantages including easier to manipulation, faster for healing and lower re-recurrent rate.
出处 《广州医药》 2013年第5期25-27,共3页 Guangzhou Medical Journal
关键词 腹股沟疝 IPOM 复发 Inguinal hernia Laparoscopic IPOM Recurrence
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Hatzitheofilou C, Lakhoo M, Sofianos C, et al. Laparo- scopic inguinal hernia repair by an intraperitoneal onlay mesh technique using expanded PTFE: a prospective study [J] . Surg Laparosc Endosc, 1997, 7 (6): 451- 455.
  • 2Berger D, Bientzle M. Polyvinylidene fluoride: a suitable mesh material for laparoseopie ineisional and parastomal hernia repair! A prospective, observational study with 344 patients [J] . Hernia, 2009, 13 (2): 167-172.
  • 3Berger D. Laparoseopic IPOM technique [J] . Chirurg, 2010, 81 (3): 211-215.
  • 4Czudek S, Mec V, Rtha D, et al. Methods of intraperito- neal placement of mesh in laparoscopic surgery of inguinal hernias ( IPOM-Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh) [ J ]. Rozhl Chir, 2001, 80 (1): 30-34.
  • 5Conze J, Rosch R, Klinge U, et al. Polypropylene in the intra-abdominal position: influence of pore size and sur- face area [J] . Hernia, 2004, 8 (4): 365-372.
  • 6Gruber-Blum S, Petter-Puchner AH, Brand J, et al. Comparison of three separate antiadhesive barriers for in- traperitoneal on[ay mesh hernia repair in an experimental model [J] . Br J Surg, 2011, 98 (3): 442-449.
  • 7Ioffe AIu, Vasilv AV. Laparoscopic intraabdominal her- nioplasty as the operation of choice in the inguinal hernia treatment [J] . Klin Khir, 2012, 1: 26-29.
  • 8Roy P, De A. Single-incision laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh hernioplasty for anterior abdominal wall herni- a: a safe and feasible approach [ J ] . J Minim Access Surg, 2011, 7 (1): 37-39.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部