“殊途同归”或“异彩纷呈”?——“言象意”与英伽登文学作品理论差异性

“All Roads Leading to Rome”,Or“Splendor”? ——Differences Between“Words-Image-Meaning”and Ingarden's Literature Theory

"言""象""意"及三者关系是中国传统文论的重要概念,其理论内涵对后世文论、画论等影响深远。罗曼·英伽登的现象学文学理论将作品看作是一个"意向性客体",认为文学作品具有四层基本的结构层次。通过对中国传统的"言""象""意"理论与英伽登的文学作品理论进行比较研究,我们可以发现二者有着一定程度的相似性。但在这些相同的背后,有着巨大的不同。进行中西理论比较研究之时,更重要的是要看到二者各自不同的哲学根源与各自的艺术特点,而不是盲目地将二者进行比附或者试图通过其中一方来确立另一方的重要性。

＂Speech ＂-＂symbol＂-＂meaning＂ and the relations of them are important concepts in Chinese Intentionality Object＂, and holds that literary works have four basic structure layers. Through a comparative study between Chinese traditional literary theory of ＂speech＂-＂symbol＂- ＂meaning and Ingarden＇s phenomenology literary theory, we can find that both have a certain degree of similarity. But behind these sameness, has a huge different. Carries on the comparative study between Chinese and westem theories, the more important is to see the difference of their own philosophical origin and artistic characteristics, rather than followed one to another blindly, or through one of the parties to establish the importance of the otherparty.