论庄子与惠施哲学思想之差异——以“濠粱之辩”为中心之考察

On the Difference of Philosophical Thinking Between Chuang Tse and Hui Shi——Centering on the Debating at Hao Liang River

庄子和惠施分别是先秦道家和名家的著名代表人物。在《庄子》中记载了两人的许多辩论和对话,最著名的辩论就是"濠粱之辩"。通过"濠粱之辩"可以看出庄子与惠施哲学思想之差异。具体来讲有三点:"天地一体"与"天地一指":世界观之差异;"乐"与"知":认知方式之差异;"逍遥"与"泛爱":人生哲学之差异。

Hui Shi and Chuang Tse are respectively representatives of the school of Logicians and the school of Taoists in the Pre-Qin period. There are many records of their debates and dialogues in Chuang Tse, the best-known one being the debate at Hao Liang River, which shows the differences in philosophical thinking between the two. To be concrete, there exist three differences between them： firstly, ＂the universe as a whole＂ vs. ＂the universe as one thing＂, this shows their difference in world outlook; secondly, ＂pleasure＂ vs. ＂knowledge＂, exhibits their difference in cognitive style; thirdly, ＂happiness＂ vs. ＂philanthropy＂ indicate difference in the philosophy of life.