期刊文献+

生物标志物技术在莱州湾污染评价中的应用 被引量:1

Application of biomarker technology to evaluate the marine pollution in Laizhou Bay
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以斑尾刺虾虎鱼(Acanthogobius ommaturus)肝脏内6种酶(超氧化物歧化酶,SOD;丙二醛,MDA;过氧化氢酶,CAT;谷胱甘肽还原酶,GR;谷胱甘肽S-转移酶,GST;谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶,GPx)作为生物标记物,同时引入生物标志物综合响应指数(IBR),结合沉积物数据评价了莱州湾水质污染状况。结果显示,3种酶分别与沉积物中重金属浓度相关性较高:即SOD与重金属Pb浓度有较强相关性,GR与重金属Pb、Cr浓度为负相关,GPx与重金属Hg、Cu浓度为中等程度负相关。近岸的河口、港口附近所调查站位生物标志物活力(含量)普遍偏高,而远离河口、港口海域的站位相应的生物标志物活力(含量)偏低。生物标志物综合响应指数(IBR)范围在0.42~6.10之间,平均为2.12,最高值站位在龙口港西南,而最低值站位在湾内北部中央,表明在湾内东北部、黄河口及近南岸海域3个区域中IBR值均呈现出由近岸向湾中央逐渐减小的趋势。 Six enzymes ( SOD, MDA, CAT, GR, GST and GPx) in the liver of Acanthogobius ommaturus were measured as biomarkers, and integrated biomarker response (IBR) was introduced. Combining with the indexs in the surface sediments, the pollution condition of Laizhou Bay was evaluated. Results showed that three enzymes were highly correlated with heavy metal concentrations in the sediment:SOD was highly correlated with Pb concentration, GR was negatively correlated with Pb, Cr concentrations and GPx showed mediumly negative correlation with Hg and Cu concentrations. Biomarker vitality (content) in some stations near the estuary or harbor were higher,and others away were lower. The IBR value ranged from 0.42 to 6.10 and the averabe was 2.12, and the site with the highest value was at the southwest of Longkou Port and the lowest value was in the north centre of the Laizhou Bay. The results showed that the IBR value was becoming smaller from nearshore site to the centre of the bay in the three areas ( the northwest of the bay, the estuary of Huanghe River and the area near south bank).
出处 《海洋渔业》 CSCD 北大核心 2013年第3期316-323,共8页 Marine Fisheries
基金 基于生物标志物的莱州湾污染综合评价技术研究(2011062) 海洋公益性行业科研专项经费项目(200905019) "水生动物营养与饲料‘泰山学者’岗位"经费资助
关键词 斑尾刺虾虎鱼 生物标志物 综合响应指数 污染评价 莱州湾 ius ommaturus biomarker IBR pollution assessment Laizhou Bay
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

二级参考文献218

共引文献569

同被引文献23

  • 1陈仪取,冯涛,郭祥群.3种农药对花鲈抗氧化酶和乙酰胆碱酯酶影响的研究[J].厦门大学学报(自然科学版),2004,43(6):828-832. 被引量:16
  • 2Lennarz W J, Lane M D. Encyclopedia of biological chemistry . New York. Academic Press, 2004: 224-228.
  • 3Flohe L. Selenoproteins and Mimics [M2. Springer Ber lin: Heidelberg, 2012 : 1-25.
  • 4Brigelius-Floh6 R, Maiorino M. Glulathione peroxidases [J]. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)General Subjects, 2013, 1830 (5) :3289-3303.
  • 5Narbonne J F, Daubeze M,Clrandcau C, et al. Scale of classification based on biochemical markers in mus- sles: application to pollution monitoring in Eurol)ean coasts [J]. Biomarkers, ]999, 4(6):415 -124.
  • 6Zanette J, Monserrat J M, Bianchini A. Biochemical biomarkers in gills of mangrove oyster Crassostrea rlli zophorae from three Brazilian estuaries [J]. Compara tive Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Toxicology & Pharmacology, 2006, 143(2) :187-195.
  • 7Oliveira M, Maria V L, Ahmad l, et al. Contamina tion assessment of a coastal lagoon (Ria de Awiro, Portugal) using defence and damage biochemical indi cators in gill of Liza aurata an integrated biomar ker approach [J]. Environmental Pollution, 2009, 157 (3) :959-967.
  • 8Richardson B J, Mak E, De I.uca Abbott S B, et al. Antioxidant responses to polycyclic aromatic hydrocar bons and organoehlorine pesticides in green lipped mussels (Perna viridis):do mussels "integrate" hio marker responses? [J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2008, 57(6) :503-514.
  • 9Sun H, Zhou Z, Dong Y, et al. Identification and expression analysis of two Toll-like receptor genes from sea cucumber (Apostichopus japonicus) [J]. Fish & Shellfish Immunology, 2013, 34(1).147-158.
  • 10Van Der Oost R, Vindimian E, Van Den Brink P J, et al. Biomonitoring aquatic pollution with feral eel (Anguilla anguilla ). III. Statistical analyses of relationships between contaminant exposure and biomarkers [J]. Aquatic Toxicology, 1997, 39 ( 1 ) : 45-75.

引证文献1

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部