摘要
盗窃罪与职务侵占罪的辨析一直是办案实务中的争议难点。结合实际案例,笔者就盗窃罪与职务侵占罪如何准确定性,提出了四大定性法则:"工作之便"抑或"职务之便"定性法则、是否"具有合法权限持有、管理单位财物"定性法则、法益定性法则和法益定性法则。
Discrimination between crime of duty occupation and larceny is always a controversial problem on the practice.Combined with actual cases,the author puts forward the four qualitative rule concerning how to definite accurately between theft and job occupation crime:"job convenience"or"duty"qualitative rule,whether "with lawful authority holding,management unit property" qualitative rule,qualitative rules of law,state of violated property qualitative rule.
出处
《云南警官学院学报》
2013年第2期93-95,共3页
The Journal of Yunnan Police College
关键词
盗窃罪
职务侵占罪
研判
定性
Crime of Duty occupation
Larceny
Discrimination
Qualitative