期刊文献+

CPR1000压水堆核电厂磁粉检测替代渗透检测的可行性探讨 被引量:2

Feasibility Study on the Replacement of PT with MT in CPR1000 PWR Nuclear Power Plants
下载PDF
导出
摘要 CPR1000压水堆核电厂大量采用铁磁性材料,表面缺陷检查基本采用渗透检测技术。在确定的试验环境条件和参数下,通过对BOSS焊缝、90°角焊缝、搭接焊缝以及小型部件(异形件)分别采用磁粉检测和渗透检测进行对比试验,探讨磁粉检测技术替代渗透检测技术的可行性。试验结果表明,在铁磁性材料工件上,磁粉检测比渗透检测对缺陷的灵敏度和检出率更高,操作时间更短,缺陷显示的形貌更完整且不扩散。因此,在铁磁性材料工件上用磁粉检测替代渗透检测是可行和可靠的。 In CPR1000 PWR nuclear power plants, many devices are made of ferromagnetic materials, whose surface defects inspection usually uses the liquid penetration examination. Under the determined environmental conditions and parameters, comparison tests between PT and MT for BOSS welds, 90 ° fillet welds, lap welds, and shaped pieces are carried out respectively, in order to study the feasibility of the replacement of PT with MT. The experimental results show that, for the workpieces made of ferromagnetic materials, MT has a higher detection rate of defects, higher detection sensitivity, and a shorter operating time than PT, and the defective display of MT is more complete and nondiffusible. Therefore, the replacement of PT with MT is feasible and reliable.
出处 《无损检测》 2013年第8期73-75,共3页 Nondestructive Testing
关键词 压水堆核电厂 铁磁性材料 磁粉检测 渗透检测 可行性 PWR nuclear power plants Iron magnetic materials Magnetic particle testing Penetrant testing Feasi-bility
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1谢杰,李平,彭志珍.CPR1000压水堆核电站在役检查用无损检测方法的优化[C]//中国电机工程学会年会论文集.贵州:[s.n],2011..
  • 2宋志哲.磁粉检测[M].北京:中国劳动社会保障出版社,2007.
  • 3胡学知.渗透检测[M].北京:中国劳动社会保障出版社,2007.
  • 4魏鹏宇.铁磁性容器的渗透与磁粉检测方法比较[J].无损检测,2009,31(5):415-416. 被引量:6
  • 5JB/T4730--2005,承压设备无损检测[S].

共引文献59

同被引文献2

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部