期刊文献+

纯生啤酒与熟啤酒老化与抗老化水平的初步研究 被引量:2

Preliminary Study on Oxidation and Anti-Oxidation Level Between Draft Beer and Pasteurized Beer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过对0.45μm膜过滤和62℃、30 min巴氏灭菌前后啤酒的TBA值、DPPH清除率、总多酚含量等指标的测定,初步分析了纯生啤酒与熟啤酒因后处理工艺的不同而导致的老化及抗老化指标上的差异。熟啤酒的巴氏灭菌过程中,加热导致啤酒老化物质增多,醛类质量分数上升30.85%,老化程度加深,实际生产中TBA值因巴氏灭菌上升1.67%;而纯生啤酒的膜过滤过程使啤酒的内源性抗老化物质减少,3种样品中总多酚质量分数分别降低了9.149%、4.439%、6.022%,实际生产中DPPH清除率因膜过滤下降了3.24%。新鲜的纯生啤酒较熟啤酒老化程度低,口感较好,但由于抗老化物质少于熟啤酒,在贮存过程中老化速率大于熟啤酒,以致最终老化程度超过熟啤酒。 In this study,we compared the TBA,DPPH clearance rate and polyphenols of beer filtrated though 0.45 μm membrane with that pasteurized at 60℃ for 30 minntes,analyzing the difference between the two beers which adopted different post-treatment technology. During the pasteurization,tile staling compounds generate and the content of aldehydes increases by 30.85%. At tile same time,beer aging deepens and TBA increases by 1.67% during pasteurization in real production. Filtration can intercept and adsorb endogenous anti-oxidants in draft beer. So the content of polyphenols decreases by 9.149% ,4.439% ,6.022%respeetively. The DPPH clearance rate decreases by 3.24% during filtration in real production. The aging level of fresh draft beer is lower than pasteurized beer,but it has a higher aging rate due to less endogenous anti-oxidants. As a result,the aging level of draft beer will be deeper than pasteurized beer during storage.
出处 《食品与生物技术学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第7期718-725,共8页 Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology
基金 国家863计划(2013AA102106-03 2012AA021303) 国家自然科学基金项目(31271919) 江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD) 江苏省创新基金项目(BC2009291) 111引智计划 教育部新世纪人才支持计划项目(NCET-10-0453)
关键词 纯生啤酒 熟啤酒 老化 抗老化 draft beer pasteurized beer oxidation level anti-oxidation level
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1周广田,李宁,任金艳.纯生啤酒的特点和生产管理的重点[J].酿酒科技,2007(5):118-121. 被引量:9
  • 2王晓丽,傅学起,张嘉琪.有机微滤膜处理对啤酒品质的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2009,37(16):7663-7665. 被引量:5
  • 3刘景,董建军,李崎,顾国贤,陈坚.啤酒老化综合评价指标的初步研究[J].食品与发酵工业,2008,34(8):37-41. 被引量:5
  • 4Grugsby J H,Palamand S R. The use of thiobarbituric acid as a mean of the degree of beer staling [J]. Am Soe Brew Chem, 1976(34) :89-98.
  • 5Sun Q,Faustman C,Senecal Aet al. Aldehyde reactivity with 2-thiobarbituric acid and TBARS infreeze-dried beef during aecelerated storage[J]. Meat Science, 2001 (57) : 55-60.
  • 6Ke Ding,Dawei Ma. Asymmetric synthesis of c,c-disubstituted amino acids by diastereoselective functionalization of enantiopu- rephenyloxazinones, derivatives of asymmetric Strecker reaction products of aldehydes[J]. Tetrahedron, 2001 (57) : 6361-6366.
  • 7Andeen M L,Skibsled L H. Electron spin resonance spin trapping identification of radicals formed during aerobic forced aging of beer[J]. J Agric Food Chem, 1998 (46) : 1272-1275.
  • 8Stephenson W H,Biawa J P,Miraele R E,et al. Laboratory-scale studies of the impact of oxygen on mashing [J]. J Inst Brew, 2003 (109) : 273-283.
  • 9Huvaere K, Andersen M L,Olsen K,el al. Radicaloid-type oxidative decomposition of beer bittering agents revealed[J]. Chemisty- a European Journal, 2003 (9) : 4693-4699.
  • 10严敏,李崎,顾国贤.浅论自由基与啤酒风味老化[J].啤酒科技,2005(4):22-23. 被引量:5

二级参考文献75

共引文献87

同被引文献24

引证文献2

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部