期刊文献+

复合生物杀菌剂F6-11的安全性毒理学研究

Toxicological Assessment on Safety to a Compounded F6-11 Microbial Disinfectant
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:为研究复合生物杀菌剂F6-11毒性,采用动物实验法进行毒理学评价。方法:对复合生物杀菌剂F6-11进行小鼠急性毒性试验、小鼠骨髓嗜多染红细胞微核试验、亚急性毒性试验、家兔多次完整皮肤刺激试验、急性眼刺激试验、豚鼠皮肤变态反应试验、鱼类延长毒性14天试验。结果:复合生物杀菌剂F6-11对小鼠急性毒性LD50>5000 mg/kg.bw,属于实际无毒级物质;小鼠微核试验该杀菌剂各剂量组与阴性对照组比较,微核率无显著性差异(P>0.05);亚急性毒性试验动物血常规、生化指标及各脏器均未发现异常;对家兔多次完整皮肤及眼刺激反应积分均为0,均属无刺激性;对豚鼠皮肤变态反应试验组动物与阴性对照组无可见不同,试验组动物皮肤致敏反应积分为0,无致敏作用;鱼类延长毒性14天试验无异常。结论:毒理学研究表明,复合生物杀菌剂F6-11具有良好的使用安全性。 Objective: To study the toxicity of a compounded F6-11 microbial disinfectant, and to evaluate the toxicological evaluation by the animal test methods. Methods: Mouse acute oral toxicity test, mouse bone marrow polychromatic erythrocyte micronucleus test, subacute toxicity test, multiple intact dermal irritation test in rabbits, acute eye irritation test, skin sensitization test in cony pig, prolonged toxicity 14-day study test in fish were conducted in this study. Results: LD50 in mouse acute oral toxicity test was higher than 5000 mg/kg.bw. No significant difference between testing group and control group was found in mouse bone marrow polychromatic eryth- rocyte micronucleus test (P〉0.05). Subacute toxicity test found no abnormalities in animal blood routine, blood biochemical indexes and various organs, No irritating effects were found on intact skin and eyes of test animals. The microbial disinfectant had no sensitization in cony pigs. It had no abnormalities in fish tests. Conclusion: The results suggests that the F6-11 microbial disinfectant is safe for application.
出处 《现代生物医学进展》 CAS 2013年第23期4459-4462,共4页 Progress in Modern Biomedicine
关键词 复合生物杀菌剂 急性毒性 亚急性毒性 鱼类试验 Compounded microbial disinfectant Acute toxicity Subacute toxicity Fish test
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1任凤兰,崔凤珍.微生物制剂的开发及应用[J].河南科技,1999,18(7):23-23. 被引量:3
  • 2Kuklina I, Kouba A, Koza k P. Real-Time Monitoring Of Water Quality Using Fish And Crayfish As Bio-Indicators: A Review [J]. Environ Monit Assess, 2012:7.
  • 3国家技术监督局.GBl5670-1995农药登记毒理学试验方法[S].北京:中国标准出版社,1995.
  • 4中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T21808-2008化学品鱼类延长毒性14天试验[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2008:1-6.
  • 5向双云,周珍辉,马建民,王振玲,宋渊.新型生物农药-多杀菌素[J].现代生物医学进展,2008,8(9):1750-1752. 被引量:13
  • 6罗红,刘家发,张啟嫒,罗兰,谭晓东.氯乙酸甲酯的急性和亚慢性毒性实验研究[J].中国职业医学,2007,34(2):162-163. 被引量:5
  • 7Proia L, Morin S, Peipoch M, et al. Resistance and Recovery of River Biofilms Receiving Short Pulses of Triclosan and Diuron[J]. Sci Total Environ, 2011,409(17): 3129-3137.
  • 8Gerola AP, Santana A, Fran'a PB, et al. Effects of Metal And The Phytyl Chain On Chlorophyll Derivatives: Physicochemical Evalua- tion For Photodynamic Inactivation of Microorganisms[J]. Photochem Photobiol, 2011, 87(4): 884-894.
  • 9Ricart M, Guasch H, Alberch M, et al. Triclosan Persistence Through Wastewater Treatment Plants And Its Potential Toxic Effects On River Biofilms[J]. Aquat Toxicol, 2010, 100(4): 346-353.
  • 10Lin D, Xie X, Zhou Q, et al. Biochemical And Genotoxic Effect of Triclosan On Earthworms (Eisenia Fetida) Using Contact And Soil Tests[J]. Environ Toxicol, 2012, 27(7): 385-392.

二级参考文献10

共引文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部