摘要
为了满足国际仲裁消费者的需求,《美国仲裁协会国际仲裁规则》于2006年进行修改并规定了紧急保全措施。紧急保全措施采取选择性退出适用方式,体现了美国仲裁协会对紧急保全措施的信心。紧急保全措施的具体规定极富灵活性。但该规则中没有规定采取紧急保全措施后当事人应当提起仲裁的期限。中国应当在仲裁性质问题上接受契约论,各仲裁机构应规定仲裁庭采取临时措施的权力。
In order to satisfy the international arbitration consumers demands, the American Arbitration Association modified its International Arbitration Rules in 2006. In these rules, the American Arbitration Association establishes the emergency measures arbitration unless the parties agree of protection, which shall apply to otherwise. The provisions of theserules reflect the American Arbitration Association' s strong confidence in the emergency measures of protection. The provisions of emergency measures of protection are flexible. However, these rules fail to provide the time limit for the parties to initiate the arbitration. China should accept the contractual theory about the nature of international commercial arbitration. Arbitration institutions in China should provide the arbitrators' right to order the interim measures.
出处
《北京仲裁》
2008年第3期140-151,共12页
Beijing Arbitration Quarterly
关键词
美国仲裁协会
临时措施
紧急保全措施
仲裁前公断程序
American Arbitration Association Interim MeasuresEmergency Measures of Protection Pre - Arbitral Referee Procedure