不同工作记忆负荷对形状干扰子注意捕获的影响被引量：1

Different Working Memory Loads on the Effect of Attentional Capture for Form Distracter

下载PDF

导出

摘要该研究考察了不同工作记忆负荷对形状干扰子注意捕获的影响。采用2(工作记忆高负荷vs低工作记忆负荷)×2(无关形状干扰子出现vs无关形状干扰子不出现)两因素被试内设计,12名被试参加实验。结果发现,以前被认为不能捕获注意的显著性较弱的无关形状干扰子刺激,在高工作记忆负荷下捕获了注意。因此工作记忆负荷对注意捕获有重要影响,刺激显著性较弱的干扰子能否捕获注意主要取决于工作记忆负荷水平。 This study examined different working memory loads on the effect of attentional capture for form distracter. The experiment was a within -subject design of 2 （high vs. low working memory loads） x 2 （irrele- vant form distracters appeared vs. irrelevant form didnt appear）. Twelve subjects took part in the experiment. The results showed previously study considered that the irrelevant form distracters could not capture attention due to the weak feature but in high working memory it could capture attention. Therefore, working loads had a major impact on attentional capture. Whether the weak feature could capture attention or pended largely on the level of working memory loads. memory not de-

作者张斌

机构地区湖南中医药大学人文社科学院

出处《山东师范大学学报（人文社会科学版）》 2013年第4期120-124,共5页 Journal of Shandong Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences)

基金湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目(12YBA244) 福建省社科规划青年项目(2009C202) 湖南中医药大学重点学科建设经费资助(校行科字2012年2号)的阶段性成果

关键词工作记忆负荷形状干扰子注意捕获自上而下的认知控制 working memory loads Irrelevant form distracter Attentional capture Top - down cognitive control

分类号 B84 [哲学宗教—心理学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献26

1)Theeuwes J, Burger R. Attentional control during visual search : the effect of irrelevant singletons. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Hu- man Perception and Performance, 1998, 24(5) : 1342 -1353.
2Turatto M, Galfano G. Color, form and luminance capture attention in visual search. Vision Research, 2000,40( 13 ) : 1639 -1643.
3Yeshurun Y, Kimchi R, Sha' shoua. Perceptual objects capture attention. Vision research, 2009,49 (10) :1329 - 1335.
4Lien MC, Ruthruff E, Goodin Z, et al. Contingent attentional capture by top - down control settings : converging evidence from event - re- lated potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2008, 34 (3) : 509- 530.
5Koelewijn T, Bronkhorst A, Theeuwes J. Auditory and visual capture during focused visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2009, 35(5) :1303 -1315.
6Theeuwes J. Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception and Psychophysies, 1992, 51 (6) : 599 -606.
7Yantis S, Jonides J. Attentional capture by abrupt onsets : new perceptual objects or visual masking.'? . Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance, 1996, 22 ( 6 ) : 1505 - 1514.
8Theeuwes J. Stimulus - driven capture and attentional set: selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. Journal of Experimental Psy- chology: Human Perception and Performance, 1994, 20(4) : 799 -806.
9Yantis S, Egeth H E. On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus - driven attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychol- ogy : Human Perceplion and Performance, 1999, 25 ( 3 ) : 661 - 676.
10Theeuwes J. Stimulus - driven capture and attentional set : selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. Journal of Experimental Psy- chology: Human Perception and Performance, 1994, 20(4) : 799 -806.

同被引文献36

1李寿欣,丁兆叶,张利增.认知方式与线索特征对前瞻记忆的影响[J].心理学报,2005,37(3):320-327. 被引量：28
2李寿欣,宋艳春.不同认知方式中小学生的前瞻记忆的研究[J].心理发展与教育,2006,22(2):18-22. 被引量：22
3李寿欣,周颖萍.个体认知方式与材料复杂性对视空间工作记忆的影响[J].心理学报,2006,38(4):523-531. 被引量：32
4Abney, D. H. ,McBride, D. M. , & Petrella, S. N. (2013). Interac- tive effects in transfer-appropriate processing for evented-based pro- spective memory: The roles of efforts, ongoing task, and PM cue prop- erties. Memory & Cognition, 41(7), 1032 -1045.
5Blowers, G. H. , & O' CONNOR, K. (1978). Relation of eye move- ments to errors on the rod-and-frame test. Perceptual and motor skills,46(3) , 719-725.
6Brewer, G. A., Knight, J. B., Marsh, R. L., & Unsworth, N. (2010). Individual differences in event-based prospective memory: Evidence for multiple processes supporting cue detection. Memory & Cognition, 38(3) , 304 -311.
7Cohen, A. L. , Jaudas, A. , & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2008). Number of cues influences the cost of remembering to remember. Memory & cogni- tion, 36(1) , 149 -156.
8Cona, G., Bisiaeehi, P. S., & Moscovitch, M. (2013). The effects of focal and nonfocal cues on the neural correlates of prospective memory : insights from ERPs. Cerebral Cortex, 24( 10), 2630 -2646.
9Cronbach, L. J. (1990). Essentials of psychological testing. 5th ed. New York: happer and Row publishers, 206 -218.
10Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (2005). Prospective memory: multiple retrieval processes. Current Directions in Psychological Sci- ence, 14 (6), 286 - 290.