期刊文献+

中美农地征收补偿制度比较研究 被引量:5

Comparative Research on Compensation for Land Expropriation in China and United States
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国现行的农地征收补偿制度因其固有的缺陷,不仅导致了土地资源配置的低效率,而且严重损害了失地农民的利益。基于对中美两国农地征收的补偿原则、补偿范围、补偿方式和补偿对象的比较,我们发现,有必要结合我国的国情,借鉴美国的农地征收补偿经验,通过采用公正补偿原则、拓宽补偿范围、实行多元化的补偿标准、完善补偿形式、改革集体土地所有制,渐进地构建具有中国特色的农地征收补偿制度。 The inherent defects of China's prevailing compensation system for expropriation of farmland not on ly lead to low efficiency in the allocation of land resources, but also to the detriment of those peasants whose land is taken by the government. Based on a comparison of he principles, scopes, forms, standards and objects of the cur rent compensation system between China and United States, we find that it is necessary to learn from the U. S. while taking into our consideration China's own conditions by providing fair compensation, expanding the scope of compensation, upgrading the standards of compensation gradually, improving all forms of compensation and refor ming the collective land system in order to gradually establish a compensation system of farmland taking that is based on justice and economic efficiency
出处 《西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2013年第5期29-35,共7页 Journal of Northwest A&F University(Social Science Edition)
基金 中国矿业大学2013年度社会科学基金项目 中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金项目(2013W17)
关键词 农地征收 公正补偿 中美比较 land expropriation just compensation comparison between China and America
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1朱红英.土地征收补偿范围国际比较[J].浙江经济,2008(9):60-61. 被引量:7
  • 2Constitution of Vermont(1777)[BE/OL]. [2006-09- 16]. http://www, worldpolicy, org/globalrights/usa/ 1777-Vermont-Constitution. html.
  • 3William Blakstone, Sir. Commentaries on The Laws of England [M] Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979.
  • 4炜玮.中国财产征收制度研究[D].清华大学博士学位论文,2008.
  • 5William B. Stoebuck. A General Theory of Eminent Domain[J].WASH. L. REV, 1972(47) :575-579.
  • 6Leslie Pickering Francis. Eminent Domain Compensa- tion in Western States: A Critique of the Fair Market Mode[J]. Utah Law Review,1984,26(3) :429-484.
  • 7Richard A. Posner, Economic Analysis of Law[M]. 1988.
  • 8傅瑜.农村土地流转法律规制的宪法学思考[J].中南大学学报(社会科学版),2011,17(5):89-94. 被引量:5
  • 9Gary T,Schwarts. Mixed Theories of Tort Law:Affir- ming Both Deterrence and Corrective Justice[J].TEX L. REV 1997,75:1801.
  • 10S Pufendorf. De Jure Nature et Gentium 1285. C. and W. Old father transls. 1934, Quoted in William B. Stoe- buck,A General Theory of Eminent Domain[J]. Wash. L. Rev, 1972,47 : 553-584.

二级参考文献8

  • 1汪进元,陈乓.权利限制的立宪模式之比较[J].法学评论,2005,23(5):8-14. 被引量:12
  • 2史蒂芬·霍尔姆斯,凯斯·R·桑斯坦.权利的成本--为什么自由依赖于税[M].毕竞悦,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2004:83.
  • 3芦部信喜.宪法[M].林来梵,等,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2006:204.
  • 4陈新民.法治同公法学原理与实践[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社.2007.
  • 5人卫·施韦卡特.超越资本主义[M].宋萌荣译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2006:6.
  • 6乔·萨托利.民丰新论[M].冯克利,阎克文译.北京:东方出版社,1998:108-115.
  • 7刘金梅:《产权与政治--国家、集体与农民关系视角下的村庄经验》,中国社会科学出版社2006年版.
  • 8柯武刚 史漫飞.制度经济学[M].北京:商务印书馆,2000..

同被引文献107

引证文献5

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部