摘要
目的探讨糖尿病心肌病(DCM)与外周血单个核细胞E26转录因子(Ets)1的表达相关性,初步探讨Ets.1在DCM发病机制中可能的作用,为临床诊治DCM提供新的思路。方法选择2010年l一12月广东医学院附属医院DCM患者28例(DCM组)、单纯2型糖尿病患者30例(2型糖尿病组)和同期体检健康者30例(对照组)。采用SYBRGreenI实时荧光定量逆转录聚合酶链反应检测外周血单个核细胞Ets.1mRNA表达,记录其他临床及实验室生化指标。结果①DCM组LDL—C、TG高于对照组,二尖瓣舒张早期血流速度峰值/舒张晚期血流速度峰值(E/A)比值低于对照组,组间差异均有统计学意义[LDL—C:(3.3±1.2)mmol/L比(2.5±0.8)mmol/L,TG:(3.5±1.8)mmol/L比(1.8±0.6)mmol/L,E/A:(0.45±0.14)比(1.24±0.16),均P〈0.05];DCM组和2型糖尿病组空腹血糖(FBG)、糖化血红蛋白(HbAlc)均高于对照组,组间差异均有统计学意义[DCM组分别为(8.7±3.6)mmol/L和(8.5±2.6)%,2型糖尿病组分别为(9.0±2.5)mmol/L和(9.0±1.6)%,对照组分别为(5.4±1.2)mmol/L和(5.3±1.2)%,均P〈0.05]。DCM组E/A低于2型糖尿病组(0.93±0.34),组间差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。②DCM组单个核细胞Ets.1mRNA表达明显高于对照组,组间差异有统计学意义(0.58±0.17比0.42±0.15,P〈0.05);DCM组和2型糖尿病组基质金属蛋白酶(MMP)9表达[(3.7±0.8)、(2.1±0.6)斗∥L]均明显高于对照组[(1.5±0.5)峙/L],差异均有统计学意义(均P〈0.05),DCM组与2型糖尿病组间差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。~DCM患者Ets.1mRNA表达与MMP-9呈正相关(r=0.81,P=0.03),与E/A比值、FBG、HbAlc、LDL-C、TG无相关性(r值分别为旬.52、0.73、0.26、0.06、0.72,均P〉0.05)。~DCM危险因素分析结果显示Ets-1mRNA高表达为危险因素[比值比=3.12,95%置信区间:2.14—4.48,P〈0.05]。结论Ets一1可上调MMP-9表达,参与2型糖尿病的发生发展,Ets.1可作为DCM的早期预测因子。
Objective To primarily discuss the role of E26 transcription factor (Ets) 1 in peripheral blood mononuclear cell of the patients with diabetic cardiomyopathy(DCM) and to provide the new measure to cure DCM. Methods DCM group ( n = 28) and type 2 diabetic mellitus (T2DM) group ( n = 30), control group ( n = 30). The expression of Ets-1 mRNA on peripheral-blood mononuclear cells was examined by SYBR Green I real-time quantitative reverse transcription ploymerse chain reaction. Results The levels of low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and triglyceride(TG) in DCM group were significantly higher than those in control group, the E/A in DCM group was significantly lower than that in control group[ LDL-C: (3.3 + 1.2)mmol/L vs (2.5 + 0.8 )mmol/L, TG: (3.5 + 1.8) mmol/L vs (1.8 ~0.6) retool/L, E/A: (0.45 +0.14)vs( 1.24 ~0.16), P 〈0.05 ]. The levels of fasting blood glucose(FBG) and glycosylated hemoglobin(Hb) Alc in DCM and T2DM groups were significantly higher than those in control group [ DCM group ( 8.7 + 3.6 ) mmol/L and ( 8.5 + 2.6) %, T2DM ( 9.0 + 2.5 ) mmol/L and (9.0 + 1.6) %, control group (5.4 ~ 1.2 ) mmol/L and ( 5.3 ~ 1.2) %, P 〈 0.05 ]. The E/A in DCM group was significantly lower than that in T2DM group(0.93 -sO. 34) (P 〈0.05 ). The expression of Ets-1 mRNA on pe- ripheral-blood mononuclear cells in DCM group were significantly higher than that in control group (0.58 ~ 0.17 vs 0.42 ~0.15, P 〈0.05). The expression of matrix metalloproteinase( MMP)9 in DCM group and T2DM group were significantly higher than those in control group [ ( 3.7 ~ 0.8 ) txg/L and ( 2. 1 ~ 0. 6 ) Ixg/L vs ( 1.5 + 0.5 ) txg/L, P 〈 0.05 ], there were not statistically significant between DCM group and T2DM group ( P 〈 0.05 ). The expres- sion of Ets-1 were correlated positively with MMP-9 in DCM (r = 0.81, P = 0.03 ), and there were not correlated positively with E/A, FBG, HbAlc, LDL-C and TG (r = -0.52, 0.73, 0.26, 0.06, 0.72, all P 〉0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that Ets-1 was high risk factors of DCM [ odd ratio (OR) = 1.31, 95% confi-donce interval (CI) :2.14-d. 48, P 〈 0.05 ]. Conclusion Ets-1 can up-regulate the expression of MMP-9 in the progress of DM, but only Ets-1 can be a predictor of DCM.
出处
《中国医药》
2013年第9期1238-1240,共3页
China Medicine
基金
广东省重大科技专项(2012A080202020)
广东省自然科学基金($2011010002620)