古希腊智者派“怀疑论”与庄子怀疑论比较分析

A contrast analysis of Ancient Greek sophists “Scepticism” and Chuang-tzu's skepticism

古希腊智者"怀疑论"从空洞的虚无表征出自身消极寂灭的形态,由于在单纯地消灭中未曾知道"单纯地消灭"并未割断消灭后新的产生这一事实性,无疑最后也滑向虚无的深渊;庄子的怀疑论表现出可知性中的不彻底性,即认为世界是可以认识的,但因个体的有限性而独断世界的不可知性,同时在相对的消逝中警惕着虚无化自身的侵袭,并在相对条件的消逝中来成其"道"本身,最后在精神气魄上做到了淡然与超脱。

Ancient Greek Sophists“Scepticism”was out of their negative Quietus morphology from empty nothingness characterization, due to destroying simply, without knowing that “simply destruction” did not cut off after the elimination of the new generation of this fact. There is no doubt that it also slid into the abyss of nothingness. On the other hand Chuang-tzu’s skepticism exhibited thoroughly unknown in the world, which means the world can be understood, but because of the limitation of individual and arbitrary of the unknown world, and at the same time, in the relative passing wary of nihility attacks itself, the relative condition goes to the“Tao”itself. Finally, it was detached and indifferently in the spirit.