期刊文献+

不同程度远视屈光不正性弱视儿童的图形视觉诱发电位 被引量:6

Pattern visual evoked potential in varying degrees hyperopic refractive amblyopic children
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:了解不同程度远视屈光不正性弱视儿童的图形视觉诱发电位(Pattern visual evoked potential,P-VEP)特征。方法:2011-05/2012-08在我院就诊的远视屈光不正性弱视儿童,按不同最佳矫正视力(best corrected vision acuity,BCVA)分为3组,P-VEP检查分析比较不同组间及与正常儿童的P100波峰潜时和振幅的变化。结果:正常组P100波峰潜时101.43±6.82ms,P100波振幅为11.27±5.38μV。在不同程度弱视组间P100波峰较正常组潜时延迟,分别为视力高于0.5组110.54±8.47ms,视力0.3~0.5组118.76±6.21ms,视力低于0.3组124.54±7.36ms,且各组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。P100波振幅均较正常下降,分别为轻度组9.94±5.28μV,中度组8.57±7.21μV,重度组7.49±5.07μV,各组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:远视屈光不正弱视儿童的图形视觉诱发电位弱视眼的P100波峰潜时延迟、P100波振幅下降。且P100波峰潜时延迟、P100波振幅下降与弱视程度相关。 AIM: To observe pattern visual evoked potential (P-VEP) of varying degrees hyperopic refractive amblyopic children. METHODS: We did P-VEP examination for the hyperopic refractive children from May 2011 to August 2012. We divided these children into three groups according to different best corrected vision (BCV): better than 0.5 amblyopic group, 0.3-0.5 amblyopic group and lower than 0.3 amblyopic group. Their P100 latency and amplitude were measured and compared with normal children group. RESULTS: The healthy eye's P100 latency was 101.43±6.82ms, P100 amplitude was 11.27±5.38μV. P100 latency delay and P100 amplitude decline in amblyopic group. Better than 0.5 amblyopic group, 110.54±8.47ms, 9.94±5.28μV; 0.3-0.5 amblyopic group 118.76±6.21ms, 8.57±7.21μV; and lower than 0.3 amblyopic group 124.54±7.36ms, 7.49±5.07μV. P100 latency and amplitude have significant different between groups (P0.05). CONCLUSION: P100 latency delay and P100 amplitude decline in hyperopic refractive amblyopia and the changes are associated with degree of amblyopia.
出处 《国际眼科杂志》 CAS 2013年第9期1931-1932,共2页 International Eye Science
关键词 弱视 图形视觉诱发电位 P100波潜时 P100波振幅 hyperopic refractive amblyopia P-VEP P100 latency P100 amplitude
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献32

共引文献45

同被引文献46

  • 1黄洪飞,袁东兵.光学药物压抑法与遮盖法治疗儿童单眼弱视疗效比较[J].黑龙江医学,2013,37(11):1074-1075. 被引量:8
  • 2甘晓玲.弱视的定义、分类及疗效评价标准[J].中国斜视与小儿眼科杂志,1996,4(3):97-97. 被引量:1013
  • 3王小涛,刘陇黔,李平惠,刘春玲,唐莉,周茂玉.双眼交替遮盖与单眼部分遮盖治疗屈光不正性弱视的疗效比较[J].四川医学,2007,28(8):945-948. 被引量:4
  • 4Venkataraman A, Kalpana. Visual outcome and rotational stability of open loop toric intraocular lens implantation in Indian eyes [J].Indian J Ophthalmol, 2013,61 ( 11 ):626-629.
  • 5Rajavi Z, Parsafar H, Ramezani A, et al. Is noncycloplegic photorefraction applicable for screening refractive amblyopia risk factors? [J]. J Ophthalmic Vis Res, 2012, 7 (10) : 3 -9.
  • 6Repka MX, Kraker RT, Beck RW, et al. Pilot study of levo- dopa dose as treatment for residual amblyopia in children aged 8 years to younger than 18 years [J]. Arch Ophthalmol, 2010, 128 (9) : 1215-1217.
  • 7林玉华,王金生,代海燕,等.左旋多巴与胞磷胆碱钠治疗大龄弱视疗效分析[J].中国药物经济学,2012,3:245-246.
  • 8Gawne TJ, Osbourne TS, Risner ML. Robust sensory gating in the cortical visual evoked potential using two spatially sepa- ratedstimuli [J ]. Clin Neurophysiol, 2011, 122 ( 3 ) : 588-593.
  • 9Parisi V, Scarale ME, Balducci N, et al. Electrophysiologi- ca1 detection of delayed postretinal neural conduction in human amblyopia [ J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2010, 51 (10) : 5041-5048.
  • 10孙文翠,梁剑蓉,郭海梅,都向锋,田金叶.左旋多巴治疗中度屈光不正性弱视的疗效观察[J].中国医学创新,2008,5(36):150-151. 被引量:2

二级引证文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部