期刊文献+

儿童七氟烷麻醉下喉罩通气的并发症分析 被引量:26

Observational study of complications connected with the use of the-laryngeal mask airway and sevoflurane anesthesia in children
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察不同年龄儿童七氟烷吸入麻醉下喉罩通气的并发症。方法2009年12月至2012年3月择期腹股沟手术160例,年龄1~10岁,美国麻醉医师学会(ASA)分级Ⅰ~Ⅱ,体质量指数14—21kg/m^2。按年龄分为7个月-〈1岁(A组)、1岁~〈3岁(B组)、4岁-(C组)、7岁-(D组)4组。不用术前用药,常规禁食禁饮。采用七氟烷和笑气吸入,在咽喉反射消失、下颌松弛、睫毛反射消失时用翻转法置入。然后进行髂腹下、髂腹股沟神经阻滞。术中不用肌松药,采用自主呼吸。手术结束后拔除喉罩,送入麻醉后复苏室(PACU)。观察手术期间相关的生命体征及手术时间、苏醒时间和Aldrete评分;麻醉过程相关的并发症,包括有无喉罩通气(LMA)移位、多次操作及呛咳、屏气、恶心、呕吐、喉痉挛、体动、一过性的低氧血症[血氧饱和度(SpO2)〈90%]和高CO2血症[呼末二氧化碳(PetCO2)〉50mmHg(1mmHg=0.133kPa)]等;术后有无疼痛、恶心、呕吐、咽喉痛、呼吸抑制等不良反应的发生。结果4组患者性别比、体质指数、手术时间、苏醒时间和Aldrete评分,差异无统计学意义。低氧血症、LMA拔除后舌后坠、恶心、呕吐、咳嗽等情况在各组中均有发生,差异无统计学意义;A组中高CO,血症的发生率高于其余3组;C组中躁动的发生率高于A组和B组;A组和D组屏气的发生率高于B组和C组。结论年龄因素对儿童七氟烷麻醉下喉罩通气并发症是有影响的,〈1岁小儿易于发生呼吸系统并发症,4~6岁的小儿易于发生躁动,在麻醉处理时更应谨慎。 Objective To comparison of the type and the incidence of complications connected with the use of the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) and sevoflurane anesthesia in different ages children. Methods 160 ASA I or II children aged 1 - 10 yrs body mass index (BMI) 14 - 21 undergoing inguinal hernia repair operation were divided into 4 groups according to their ages, 7 m - 1 yrs in group A, 1 - 3 yrs in group B, 4 -6 yrs in group C and 7 - 10 yrs in group D. General anesthesia was induced with sevoflurane and nitrous oxidein (N:O) via a pediatric circle system. No premedication were given. Insertion conditions were noted as satisfactory (jaw relaxed, lash reflex disappeared, no coughing, gagging, swallowing). LMA were placed using the reverse technique, then ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve blocks were performed. No neuromuscular blocking drugs were used and spontaneous breathing was permitted. LMA were removed after the end of operation, then the patient were sent to post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU). The time of operation and awakening, vital signs and Aldrete scale were recorded. The incidence of adverse effects (coughing, gross movement, laryngospasm, agitation, nausea, vomiting, sore-throat, respiratory depression, glossoptosis, breathholding and hypercapnia) were also noted. Results There was no significantly difference in four groups about sex, BMI, operation time, the time of awakening and Aldrete score ( P 〉 0. 05 ). The incidence of hyoxemia, glossoptosis, nausea, vomiting and cough were no significantly difference in four groups, but the incidence of hypercapnia was higher in group A than in other three groups. The incidence of agitation in group C were singnificantly higher than in group A and group B. The incidence of breathholding was higher in group A and group D than in group B and group C. Conclusion The age can influence complications connected with the use of the LMA and sevoflurane anesthesia in children. Respiratory complications is easy to occurred in children less than 1 years. Agitation is especially frequent in children 4 - 6 years.
作者 高萍 严敏
出处 《中华医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第33期2677-2679,共3页 National Medical Journal of China
关键词 并发症 喉罩通气 小儿麻醉 七氟烷 Complication Laryngeal mask airway Pediatric anesthesia Sevoflurane
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1陈怡绮,许文音,许文妍,季晨松,陈煜.喉罩通气道在儿科应用的并发症观察[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2007,6(6):50-52. 被引量:21
  • 2Nakayama S, Osaka Y, Yamashita M. The rotational technique with a partially inflated laryngeal mask airway improves the ease of insertion in children. Paediatr Anaesth, 2002,12:416-419.
  • 3米勒.米勒麻醉学.曾因明,邓小明,译.6版.北京:北京大学医学出版社,2006:359-463.
  • 4Frediani M, Blanehini G, Capanna M, et al. The laryngeal mask in pediatric anesthesia. Minerva Anestesiol, 1996,62:65-71.
  • 5Klockgether-Radke A, Gerhardt D, Muhlendyck H, et al. The effect of the laryngeal mask airway on the postoperative incidence of vomiting and sore throat in children. Anaesthesist, 1996,45 : 1085-1088.
  • 6Johr M, Berger TM. Paediatric anaesthesia and inhalation agents. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol, 2005, 19:501-522.
  • 7Meyer RR, Munster P, Werner C, et al. Isoflurane is associated with a similar incidence of emergence agitation/delirium as sevoflurane in young children-a randomized controlled study. Pediatric Anaesth, 2007,17:56-60.
  • 8Britta S yon Ungern-Sternberg, Krisztina Boda, Nell A Chambers, et al. Risk assessment for respiratory complications in paediatric anaesthesia: a prospective cohort study. Lancet,2010, 376:773- 783.
  • 9Seyidov TH, Elemen L, Solak M, et al. Passive smoke exposure is associated with perioperative adverse effects in children. J Clin Anesth, 2011, 23:47-52.

二级参考文献8

  • 1[1]Olsson GL,Ha llen B.Laryngospasm during anaesthesia:A computer-aided incidence study in 136,929 patients[J].Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,1984,28:567-575.
  • 2[2]Morray JP,Geiduschek JM,Caplan RA,et al.A comparison of pediatric and adult anesthesia closed malpractice claims[J].Anesthesiology,1993,78:461-467.
  • 3[3]Christine O,Britta S.et al.Respiratory reflex responses of the larynx differ between sevoflurane and propofol in pediatric patients[J].Anesthesiology,2005,103:1142-1148.
  • 4[4]Miriam H,Brian K,Anne H,et al.Airway complications in infants:comparison of laryngeal mask airway and the facemask-oral airway[J].Can J Anesth,2000,47(4):315-318.
  • 5[5]Bagshaw O.The size 1.5 Laryngeal Mask Airway in pediatric anesthetic practice[J].Pediatr Anesth,2002,12:420-423.
  • 6[6]Mizushima A,Wardall GL,Simpson DL.The laryngeal mask airway in infants[J].Anesthesia,1992,47:849-851.
  • 7[8]Genzwuerker HV,Fritz A,Hinkelbein J,et al.Prospective,randomized comparison of laryngeal tube and laryngeal mask airway in pediatric patients[J].Pediatric Anesthesia,2006,16:1251-1256.
  • 8胡晓,吴新民.喉罩在小儿斜视矫正术麻醉中的应用[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2003,23(6):473-474. 被引量:46

共引文献21

同被引文献202

  • 1冯燕春,凌福全,黄格,蒙月萍,农红妹.不同镇静药预防小儿七氟烷麻醉苏醒期躁动的临床观察[J].中国当代医药,2013,20(24):107-108. 被引量:6
  • 2周仁龙,杭燕南.第三代喉罩的临床应用[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2006,22(11):880-882. 被引量:162
  • 3肖全胜,郑清民,姚伟瑜,李群杰,李师阳.七氟醚复合丙泊酚麻醉诱导用于小儿喉罩置入的临床观察[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2007,23(4):337-338. 被引量:42
  • 4米勒,主编.米勒麻醉学[M].曹因明,邓小明,主译.第6版.北京:北京大学医学出版社,2006:114-5.
  • 5裘燕,李军,封凯旋,连庆泉,陈小玲,苏尔瞻.小儿全麻恢复早期并发症的危险因素[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2007,27(9):862-863. 被引量:10
  • 6SINHA A, SHARMA B, SOOD J dotracheal intubation in pediatric aesth, 2007, 17(4) : 327 -332.
  • 7LIM B, PAWAR D, NG O. Pressure support ventilation vs sponta- neous ventilation via ProSealTM laryngeal mask airway in pediatric patients undergoing ambulatory surgery: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Paediatr Anaesth, 2012, 22(4): 360-364.
  • 8GULEC H, CAKAN T, YAMAN H, et al. Comparison of hemody-namic and metabolic stress responses caused by endotracheal tube and Proseal laryngeal mask airway in laparoscopic cholecystectomy [J]. J Res Med Sci, 2012, 17(2) : 148 -153.
  • 9CARRON M, VERONESE S, GOMIERO W, et al. Hemodynamic and hormonal stress responses to endotrachcal tube and ProSeal La- ryngeal Mask Airway (tm) for laparoscopic gastric banding [ J ]. Anesthesiology, 2012, 117 (2) : 309 - 320.
  • 10PATKI A. Laryngeal mask airway vs the endotracheal tube in pae- diatric airway management: a meta- analysis of prospective ran- domised controlled trims [ J]. Indian J Anaesth, 2011, 55 ( 5 ) :537 -541.

引证文献26

二级引证文献113

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部