不确定环境下分配公平与信任对战略联盟绩效的影响被引量：8

The Effects of Distributive Justice and Trust on Alliance Performance in an Uncertainty Environment

导出

摘要基于公平理论和关系治理理论,分析了不确定环境下分配公平和信任对战略联盟绩效的作用机理。采用实证研究方法,对217家有联盟经验的企业问卷数据进行统计分析。实证结果表明:分配公平对信任有促进作用,而分配公平和信任均能提高联盟绩效;信任在分配公平和联盟绩效之间起部分中介作用;随着环境动荡性的增加,分配公平和信任对联盟绩效的正向影响增强;而随着环境复杂性的增加,分配公平和信任对联盟绩效的正向影响减弱。以上研究结论丰富了相关的理论并对战略联盟管理实践具有一定的启示。 Drawing on equity theory and relational governance theory, this study examines the effects of distributive justice and trust on alliance performance in an uncertainty environment. The findings from a survey of 271 firms with alliance experiences indicate that distributive justice leads to more trust, and both distributive justice and trust can improve alliance performance. Trust partially mediates the relationship between distributive justice and alliance performance. Distributive justice and trust have stronger positive effects on alliance performance when the environment is more dynamic, whereas they have weaker positive effects on alliance performance when the environment is more complex. These findings provide implications for the relational management of strategic alliances.

作者刘娴徐飞宋波

机构地区上海交通大学安泰经济与管理学院上海师范大学旅游学院

出处《工业工程与管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第4期64-70,78,共8页 Industrial Engineering and Management

基金国家自然科学基金资助项目(70972065) 上海市哲学社会科学基金资助项目(2012BGL008) 教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目(11YJC630178)

关键词分配公平信任环境不确定性联盟绩效 distributive justice trust environmental uncertainty alliance performance

分类号 F270 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献24

1]Das T K, Teng B. Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in joint ventures [J ]. Academy of Management Review, 19 9 8,2 3 (3) : 4 91-512.
2Dyer J H, Chu W. The role of trustworthiness in reducing transaction costs and improving performance: empirical evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea E J3. Organization Science, 2003,14(1) : 57- 68.
3Luo Y. The independent and interactive roles of procedural,distributive,and interactional justice in strategic alliances[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007,50 (3) : 644-664.
4Tang L P, Sarsfield-Baldwin L J. Distributive and procedural justice as related to satisfaction and commitment [J]. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 1996,61 (3) 25-31.
5Bstieler L, Hemmert M. Developing trust in vertical product development partnerships: A comparison of South Korea and Austria[J]. Journal of World Business, 2008,43 (1) : 35-46.
6Robson MJ, Katsikeas C S, Bello D C. Drivers and Performance Outcomes of Trust in International Strategic Alliances: The' Role of Organizational Complexity [J]. Organization Science, 2008,19 (4) : 647-665.
7Silva S C,Bradley F,Sousa C M P. Empirical test of the trust- performance link in an international alliances context [J] . International Business Review, 2012,21 (2) : 293-306.
8Aryee S,Budhwar P S, Chen Z X. Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes Test of a social exchange model[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2002,23 (3) 267-286.
9Tan J, Tan D. Environment-strategy Co-evolution and Co- alignment: A Staged Model of Chinese SOEs under transition [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2005,26 (2) 141-157.
10Dess G G, Beard D W. Dimensions of organizational task environments[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1984, 29 (1) :52-73.