期刊文献+

中法高速公路车流及荷载特性对比 被引量:7

Comparative Study on Highway Traffic Flow and Load Properties of China and France
下载PDF
导出
摘要 选取中国和法国的两组利用动态称重设备实测的高速公路车辆数据进行统计,对实测车流的车型组成特性、车流时变特性及车辆到达特性,车辆特性,不同车道车流及荷载等特性进行了详细的对比与分析,总结了车流及车辆荷载的一般分布规律.数据显示,国内车重、轴重及交通量等参数都显著高于法国,相对《公路桥涵设计通用规范》(JTG D60—2004)中车辆荷载基础数据也提高很大;每天的交通量在低谷期重车比例最高,高峰期重车比例最低;各车道之间车流及荷载特性差异性很大,并不符合互不相关假定;我国实测车辆荷载的效应极值外推结果远大于现行规范值.综合这些特性,建议对特殊桥梁的设计或评估,采用特定地点的车辆荷载;各车道汽车荷载模型应分别考虑;不同加载长度的汽车荷载模型应区别分析. Abstract: Two typical highway traffic data measured by weight-in-motion (WIM) equipment in China and France were compared, some statistics and analysis works were conducted. Traffic flow and load properties were compared in a detail way. The results show that axle weight, gross vehicle weight and traffic volume of France's are smaller than those of China's which indicate an obvious increase in comparison with the vehicle data used for the current bridge criterion (JTG D60-2004). The constitution of daily traffic shows a timely change: trucks have a higher proportion during the low tide, but a lower proportion in peak time. Results can be concluded from the data that a basic hypothesis of vehicle load model for China design code, in which all vehicle lanes are uncorrelated to each other, may not valid. Both China and France data show traffic flow and load properties in different lanes have obvious difference. Finally, a site-specific vehicle model is recommended for design and assessment. Different lanes are proposed to be considered, and a loading length depended load-model should be adapt for diversity span bridge for the actual extrapolated effect far outweighs the code value.
出处 《同济大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第9期1392-1397,共6页 Journal of Tongji University:Natural Science
基金 "十一五"国家科技支撑计划(2009BAG15B02) 国家自然科学基金(51108338)
关键词 车流及荷载特性 动态称重 多车道车辆荷载 汽车荷载模型 traffic flow and load properties weight-in-motion multi-lane vehicle load vehicle loading model
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Kishore A,Klashinsky R.Prevention of highway infrastructure damage through commercial vehicle weight enforcement[C/OL].Annual Indian Roads Congress (IRC) Session,Calcutta:Council of the Indian Roads Congress.2000.
  • 2阮欣,阮静,陈艾荣,郭济.泰州大桥中间塔鞍座抗滑安全评估[J].中国工程科学,2012,14(5):71-74. 被引量:4
  • 3阮欣,周小燚,郭济.基于合成车流的桥梁车辆荷载效应极值预测[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2012,40(10):1458-1462. 被引量:27
  • 4RUAN Xin,ZHOU Xiaoyi,GUO Ji.Extreme value extrapolation for bridge vehicle load effect based on synthetic vehicle flow[J].Journal of Tongji University:Natural Science,2012,40(10):1458.
  • 5A Getachew.Traffic load effects on bridges:statistical analysis of collected and Monte Carlo simulated vehicle data[D].Structural Engineering of Royal Institute of Technology,2003.
  • 6China Highway Planning and Design Institute.JTG D60-2004General code for design of highway bridges and culverts[S].Beijing:China Communications Press,2004.
  • 7"公路桥梁车辆荷载研究"课题组.公路桥梁车辆荷载研究[R].北京:中交公路规划设计院,1997.
  • 8"Vehicle Loads Research for Highway Bridge" Research Group.Vehicle loads research for highway bridge[S].Beijing:China Highway Planning and Design Institute,1997.
  • 9European Committee for Standardisation,et al.EuroCodel (EN 1991-2:2003):Actions on Structwes — part2:traffic loads on bridges[S].[S.1.]:CEN,2003.
  • 10郑步全,张士铎.中、小跨径多车道横向折减系数的概率计算法[J].重庆交通学院学报,1992,11(4):17-21. 被引量:4

二级参考文献25

  • 1公路悬索桥设计规范(JTJXXX--2002)[S].北京:中华人民共和国交通部,2002.
  • 2阮欣,等.中间塔索鞍与主缆相互作用机理及其抗滑安全性研究[R].同济大学,江苏省长江公路大桥建设指挥部,2011.
  • 3公路桥涵设计通用规范JTD60-2004[S].中华人民共和国交通部,2004.
  • 4AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (2005 Interim Revi- sions) [ S]. American Association of State Highway and Transpor- tation Officials, 2005.
  • 5BS 5400 -2: Specification for Loads[ S]. British Standards Insti- tution, 2006.
  • 6Eurocodel Pro't2 : Traffic Loads on Bridges [ S ]. European Com- mittee for Standardization, 2003.
  • 7Getachew A, O'Brien E J. Simplifed site -Specific traffic load models for bridge assessment [J]. Structure and Infrastructure En- gineering, 2007, 3(4) :303 -311.
  • 8OConnor A, OBrien E J. Traffic load modeling and factors influ- encing the accuracy of predicted extremes [ J ]. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2005, 32 ( 1 ) :270 - 278.
  • 9Cremona C. Probabilistic approach for cable residual strength as- sessment [ J]. Engineering Structures, 2003, 25 (3) :377 - 384.
  • 10Ruan Xin, Guo Ji, Chen Airong, et al. Middle Pylon Safety As- sessment for Three - Pylon Suspension Bridge [ C ]//IABSE - IASS-2011 Symposium, London, 2011.

共引文献32

同被引文献75

  • 1陈艾荣,马如进,许艳梅.苏通大桥运营阶段车辆荷载识别及其特性[J].重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版),2013,32(S1):729-733. 被引量:7
  • 2周军勇,石雪飞,阮欣.多塔斜拉桥汽车荷载总体响应分析[J].重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版),2013,32(S1):844-847. 被引量:1
  • 3JTGD60-2004公路桥涵设计通用规范[S].北京:人民交通出版社,2004.
  • 4许志军.沥青路面结构性能模拟[D].上海:同济大学交通运输工程学院,1994.
  • 5Getachew A,Obrien E J.Simplified site-specific traffic load models for bridge assessment[J].Structure and Infrastructure Engineering,2007,3(4):303.
  • 6Swan D J,Tardif R,Hajek J J,et al.Development of regional traffic data for the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide[J].Transportation Research Record:Journal of the Transportation Research Board,2008,2049(1):54.
  • 7Gindy M,Nassif H H.Multiple presence statistics for bridge live load based on weigh-in-motion data[J].Transportation Research Record:Journal of the Transportation Research Board,2007,2028(1):125.
  • 8Buiter R,Cortenraad W M H,Van Eck A C,et al.Effects of transverse distribution of heavy vehicles on thickness design of full-depth asphalt pavements[J].Transportation Research Record,1989,4:66.
  • 9Huang D,Wang T L,Shahawy M.Impact studies of multigirder concrete bridges[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,1993,119(8):2387.
  • 10Vanelstraete A,Francken L.Prevention of reflective cracking in pavements[M].[S.l.]:CRC Press,2004.

引证文献7

二级引证文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部