摘要
本文先论证十卷线装的"大安本"是冒充初刊的盗版。从而谈及崇祯本中自称"原本"的内阁文库本、张评本中以形形色色的装作原刊初版的本子均非真正的初刊原本,以此说明越打扮成"初刊""原本"的的本子,越可能是假的。
Beginning with the sion, the present paper further Zhupo review version. At last, argument that the Da'an version of The Golden Lotus is the fake first ver-discussed the other two fake first versions: Chongzhen version and Zhang the author reached the conclusion that the versions that disguised as the first version are all fake.
出处
《河南理工大学学报(社会科学版)》
2013年第2期218-221,共4页
Journal of Henan Polytechnic University:Social Sciences
关键词
大安本
崇祯本
张竹坡评本
Da'an version, Chongzhen version, Zhang Zhupo review version