摘要
明清两代的笔记丛谈,便已带有研究《金瓶梅》的意味。崇祯本上的评点,尤其是《第一奇书》张竹坡的评点、文龙的评点,已经是名副其实的《金瓶梅》研究。虽然现代意义上的《金瓶梅》研究,是进入20世纪以后的事,但明清时期的《金瓶梅》研究,具有发凡起例、启导引进之功。
The trace of The Golden Lotus studies is found in Qing Dynasties, for example, Cong Zheng' s comments (the statements about The Golden Lotus, that is, it is the first Though modern studies on The Golden Lotus began after 20th essays and books published during Ming and first volume) , Zhang Pozhu and Wen Long' mysterious book instead of a book on sex. century, the preliminary studies in Ming and Qing Dynasties are still valuable in that it gives an introduction to the studies in this field.
出处
《河南理工大学学报(社会科学版)》
2013年第2期222-235,共14页
Journal of Henan Polytechnic University:Social Sciences
关键词
明清
《金瓶梅》研究
发凡起例
Ming and Qing Dynasties
The Golden Lotus studies
an introduction