期刊文献+

道势之争:明初儒士与皇权关系的政治文化解读 被引量:1

The Struggle between the Orthodox Confucianism and the Imperial Power:Analyzing the Political and Cultural Relations between the Confucian Scholars and the Royalty in the Early Ming Dynasty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 皇权之于儒士的态度,明初有着从礼遇到打压的演变轨迹。《孟子节文》是皇权从打击儒士的具体行为到悍然入侵儒学思想领域的重要事件,显示了皇权不惜与儒学断然决裂的情绪。儒士"从道不从君"的话语定位及其实际抗争活动,对"势"的反击作用微乎其微,道统不得不屈服于政统,"道"为"势"曲。儒士与皇权政治文化方面的交织关系,透视出儒学工具化的内在本质。 Royalty took views from great courtesy to merciless blow on the Confucian scholars in the Early Ming Dynasty. The book of Removing Part of Mencius is a key event, it marked Royalty not only dealt a blow to the Confucian scholars but al- so intruded into the kingdom of Confucianism. It also demonstrated a kind of break between the Royalty and the Confucianism. The Confucian scholars embraced the orthodox Confucianism rather than Royalty, but their fighting had little effect. The ortho- dox Confucianism had to yield to the Royalty. Confucianism' s essence as a tool emerged by analyzing the political and cultural relations between the Confucian scholars and the Royalty.
作者 吴琦 杜维霞
出处 《安徽史学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第5期10-15,共6页 Historical Research In Anhui
关键词 儒士 皇权 《孟子节文》 the Confucian scholars the Royalty Removing Part, of Mencius
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献28

  • 1四库全书·大学衍义·自序[M].台北:台湾商务印书馆景印本文渊阁,1986.
  • 2明史·刘仲质列传[M].北京:中华书局,1984:3933.
  • 3四库全书·太祖实录[M].台北:台湾商务印书馆景印本文渊阁,1986.
  • 4四库全书·皇朝文献通考·经义考·四书[M].台湾商务印书馆景印本文渊阁,1986.
  • 5明史·礼四[M].北京:中华书局,1984:1296.
  • 6明史·钱唐传[M].北京:中华书局,1984:3982.
  • 7四库全书·孟子节文题辞[M].台北:台湾商务印书馆景印本文渊阁,1986.
  • 8明史·吕坤列传[M].北京:中华书局,1984:5938.
  • 9明史·宦官王振列传[M].北京:中华书局,1984:7773.
  • 10明史·王瑞列传[M].北京:中华书局,1984.

共引文献16

同被引文献8

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部