期刊文献+

伦理制度、企业社会责任行为与组织绩效关系研究 被引量:14

Empirical Study on Relationship among Ethical Institution,Corporate Social Responsibility Behavior and Organizational Performance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 企业伦理常常以其特殊价值和难以模仿性,而成为企业的核心竞争力。但是,不少企业却没有相应的伦理制度和具体规范,其伦理行为仅为即兴之举。而一些较成熟的企业,则将企业伦理制度化,并在企业内部稳步推行。那么,企业伦理制度化与否,对企业履行社会责任的效果,进而又对组织的绩效是否会产生影响上的差异呢?本文通过实证研究的方法,探讨和验证伦理制度对组织绩效的影响效应,并引入企业社会责任行为作为中介变量,构建了伦理制度、企业社会责任行为和组织绩效三者之间的研究模型。以企业中高层管理者为调查对象,通过167份有效数据分析发现,伦理制度对组织绩效并未产生直接正向影响,但伦理制度对企业社会责任行为具有显著的正向影响,企业社会责任行为对组织绩效有显著正向影响,并且企业社会责任行为在伦理制度与组织绩效关系之间起中介作用。因此,企业的发展和伦理道德建设应该是相辅相成、缺一不可,企业必须通过对各个利益相关者的伦理管理,才能带来整个组织绩效的提升。 Business ethics have become the core competitiveness of enterprises with its special value and difficulties to imitate. However, many enterprises have no corresponding ethical system and specific norms, and their ethical behavior is only an impromptu. While some of mature enterprises institutionalize the business ethics, and implement it steadily. So by systemizing business ethics or not, whether there's a different influence on the effect of social responsibility fulfillment and organizational performance? This paper discusses the intermediary function of corporate social responsibility behavior between ethical institution and organizational performance, through theoretical analysis and empirical test. In this paper, we build a research model on the relationship of ethical institution, corporate social responsibility behavior and organizational performance. Taking middle and senior managers as the research objects, based on the analysis of 167 valid questionnaires, the study finds that ethical institution has a non-signifieant positive impact on organizational performance but has a great influence on corporate social responsibility behavior. Meanwhile corporate social responsibility behavior shows a positive significance on organizational performance and plays a fully intermediary role between ethical institution and organizational performance. Therefore, the development of enterprises and ethical institution construction should be complementary and indispensable. Companies should master the ethical management to various stakeholders in order to improve the whole organizational performance.
出处 《中国人口·资源与环境》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第9期143-148,共6页 China Population,Resources and Environment
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"基于义利平衡观的两岸企业社会责任取向对持续经营之纵向效应研究"(编号:71172074) 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金"企业家社会责任取向对组织绩效的影响效应研究"(编号:10YJA630009)
关键词 伦理制度 企业社会责任行为 组织绩效 利益相关者 ethical institution corporate social responsibility behavior organizational performance stakeholder
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1周祖城.基于卓越伦理的竞争优势[J].南开管理评论,2002,5(2):59-62. 被引量:36
  • 2张秋惠,孙鑫.组织伦理对工作满意度影响研究[J].中国人力资源开发,2010,27(5):97-100. 被引量:6
  • 3王小锡.21世纪经济全球化趋势下的伦理学使命[J].道德与文明,1999(3):22-23. 被引量:16
  • 4林恩·夏普·佩因.领导、伦理与组织信誉案例:战略的观点[M].韩经纶,王永贵,杨永恒,译.大连:东北财经大学出版社,1999:180-181.
  • 5Verschoor C C. A Study of the Link Between a Corporation's Financial Performance and Its Commitment to Ethics [ J ]. Journal of Business Ethics, 1998,17(13) : 1509- 1516.
  • 6Gregory J K, Drozdenko R G. Relationships among Perceived Organizational Core Values, Corporate Social Responsibility, Ethics, and Organizational Performance Outcomes: An Empirical Study of Information Technology Professionals [ J ]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2010,92(3) : 341 -359.
  • 7Weaver G R, Trevino L K, Philip L C. Integrated and Decoupled Corporate Social Performance: Management Commitments, External Pressures, and Corporate Ethics Practices [ J ]. Academy of Management Journal, 1999, 42 ( 5 ) :539 - 552.
  • 8Trevino L K. Weaver G R. Organizational Justice and Ethics Program 'Follow-through' : Influences on Employees' Harmful and Helpful Behavior [ J]. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2001, 11 (4) :651 - 671.
  • 9Hunt S N, Vitell S J. A General Theory of Marketing Ethics [J]. Journal of Macromarketing, 1986, (8) :5 - 16.
  • 10Singhapakdi A, Vitell S J. System of Ethics and Its Consequences : A Survey of Marketing Professionals [ J ]. Journal of the Academy Marketing Science, 2007, 35:284 - 294.

二级参考文献80

  • 1温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰,刘红云.中介效应检验程序及其应用[J].心理学报,2004,36(5):614-620. 被引量:7399
  • 2汤海溶,黄登仕.改变上市公司资本结构的因素分析——来自中国上市公司的证据[J].管理评论,2005,17(4):3-8. 被引量:9
  • 3段文,晁罡,刘善仕.国外企业社会责任研究述评[J].华南理工大学学报(社会科学版),2007,9(3):49-55. 被引量:36
  • 4乔新生.你是否购买了道德股[N].南方周末,2001-08-16(C3).
  • 5陈金凤.《关于员工满意度和忠诚度关系的实证研究》,南京师范大学,2007年版.
  • 6夏黎.《全球化背景下的中国企业伦理建设研究》,武汉理工大学,2008年.
  • 7李波.《中国企业组织伦理气氛问卷编制及其结构的研究》,山西大学,2008年.
  • 8Carroll, A. B. In Search of a Moral Manager []], Business Horizons, 1987(3),7-15.
  • 9McGuire, J.B.,A. Sundgren and T. Schneeweis, Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance [J] ,Academy of Management Journal , 1988 vol. 31,854-872.
  • 10Aupperle, W.E, A.B. Carroll and J.D. Hatfield, An Empirical Examination of the relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability [J], Academy of Management Journal ,1985 (28),446-463.

共引文献179

同被引文献243

引证文献14

二级引证文献65

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部