期刊文献+

中国上市金融机构系统性风险的“分摊”——基于边际预期损失模型的分析 被引量:2

The Systemic Risk Contribution of the Chinese Listed Financial Institutions——An Analysis Based on the MES Model
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文基于边际预期损失模型(MES),分析中国金融市场上市金融机构的相对系统重要性。实证结果表明,通过观察中国上市金融机构在非金融危机期间的边际预期损失值,可以判断出同期该金融机构在金融市场中的相对系统重要性,那些在非金融危机期间边际预期损失值较大、杠杆率较高的金融机构,其在金融危机爆发时对中国金融市场系统性风险的贡献度也相对较大,具有更强的负外部性。根据这一结果,边际预期损失法可以用于衡量中国上市金融机构的系统重要性,从而为确定中国系统重要性金融机构提供了参考。 Based on the MES (Marginal Expected Shortfall) model, this paper analyses the relative systemic importance of the listed financial institutions in China's financial markets. The empirical results show that the relative systemic importance of the Chinese listed financial institutions can be determined according to the MES value of the institutions during the non-financialcrisis. The institution, its MES value and leverage ratio are great, will make more contributions to the systemic risks of the China's financial markets during financial crisis, and it has stronger negative external effects. The results indicate the MES method can be used to measure the systemic importance of listed financial institutions, and it can be a recommended tool to determine the systemically important financial institutions.
作者 代松
出处 《金融论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第8期29-35,共7页 Finance Forum
关键词 上市金融机构 系统重要性金融机构 系统性风险 风险测度 边际预期损失模型 listed financial institution systemically important financial institution systemic risk risk measurement Marginal Expected Shortfall model
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1贾彦东.金融机构的系统重要性分析——金融网络中的系统风险衡量与成本分担[J].金融研究,2011(10):17-33. 被引量:106
  • 2Acharya, Viral V., Pedersen,Lasse H., Philippon,Thomas, and Richardson, Matthew,2010. Measuring Systemic Risk[ R/OL]. http://vlab.stem.nyu. edu/public/static/SR-v3.pdf.
  • 3Adrian, T., and Brunnermeier, M., 2009. CoVaR[ R ]. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports, Vol.348 : 1-8.
  • 4Brownlees, Christian T., and Engle, Robert F., 2012. Volatility, Correlation and Tails for Systemic Risk Measurement [ R/OL ]. http://papers.ssrn. com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id= 1611229.
  • 5Drehmann, Mathiasand, and Tarashev, Nokola A., 2011. Measuring the Systemic Importance of Interconnected Banks [ R ]. BIS Working Paper, No.342.
  • 6Huang, X., Zhou, H., and Zhu, H.B., 2009. A Framework for Assessing the Systemic Risk of Major Financial Institutions [ J ]. Journal of Banking and Finance, (33) : 2036-2049.

二级参考文献17

  • 1Tarashev N, C Borio and K Tsatsaronis. 2010. "Attributing systemic risk to individual institutions. Methodology and policy implications," BIS Working paper, #308.
  • 2Acharya V, L Pedersen, T Philippon, and M Richardson. 2009. "Measuring Systemic Risk", mimeo, New York University.
  • 3Allen G and D Gale. 2000. "Financial contagion", Journal of Political Economy, vol 108, no 1, pp 1 - 33.
  • 4BCBS ,2011, "Global systemically important banks: Assessment methodology and the additional loss absorbency requirement", Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Consultative Document, 19 July 2011.
  • 5Castro J, D Gomez and J Tejada. 2009. "Polynomial calculation of the Shapley value based on sampling", Computers and Operations Research 36:1726 - 1730.
  • 6Drehmann M and N Tarashev, 2011. "Systemic importance: some simple indicators," BIS Quarterly review, March.
  • 7Eisenberg, L. and T. H. Noe. 2001. "Systemic risk in financial systems", Management Science, 47, 236 - 249.
  • 8Franklin Allen, Ana Babus,2010, Financial Connections and Systemic Risk, Working Papers, July 1,2010.
  • 9Gabriele Galati and Riehhild Moessner,2011 "Maeroprudential policy - a literature review", BIS Working paper, No 337, February 2011.
  • 10Gauthier C, A Lehar and M Souissi. 2010. "Macroprudential regulation and systemic capital requirements", Working papers 10 - 4, Bank of Canada.

同被引文献17

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部