期刊文献+

A comparative study on the application of various artificial neural networks to simultaneous prediction of rock fragmentation and backbreak 被引量:6

A comparative study on the application of various artificial neural networks to simultaneous prediction of rock fragmentation and backbreak
下载PDF
导出
摘要 In blasting operation,the aim is to achieve proper fragmentation and to avoid undesirable events such as backbreak.Therefore,predicting rock fragmentation and backbreak is very important to arrive at a technically and economically successful outcome.Since many parameters affect the blasting results in a complicated mechanism,employment of robust methods such as artificial neural network may be very useful.In this regard,this paper attends to simultaneous prediction of rock fragmentation and backbreak in the blasting operation of Tehran Cement Company limestone mines in Iran.Back propagation neural network(BPNN) and radial basis function neural network(RBFNN) are adopted for the simulation.Also,regression analysis is performed between independent and dependent variables.For the BPNN modeling,a network with architecture 6-10-2 is found to be optimum whereas for the RBFNN,architecture 636-2 with spread factor of 0.79 provides maximum prediction aptitude.Performance comparison of the developed models is fulfilled using value account for(VAF),root mean square error(RMSE),determination coefficient(R2) and maximum relative error(MRE).As such,it is observed that the BPNN model is the most preferable model providing maximum accuracy and minimum error.Also,sensitivity analysis shows that inputs burden and stemming are the most effective parameters on the outputs fragmentation and backbreak,respectively.On the other hand,for both of the outputs,specific charge is the least effective parameter. In blasting operation,the aim is to achieve proper fragmentation and to avoid undesirable events such as backbreak.Therefore,predicting rock fragmentation and backbreak is very important to arrive at a technically and economically successful outcome.Since many parameters affect the blasting results in a complicated mechanism,employment of robust methods such as artificial neural network may be very useful.In this regard,this paper attends to simultaneous prediction of rock fragmentation and backbreak in the blasting operation of Tehran Cement Company limestone mines in Iran.Back propagation neural network(BPNN) and radial basis function neural network(RBFNN) are adopted for the simulation.Also,regression analysis is performed between independent and dependent variables.For the BPNN modeling,a network with architecture 6-10-2 is found to be optimum whereas for the RBFNN,architecture 636-2 with spread factor of 0.79 provides maximum prediction aptitude.Performance comparison of the developed models is fulfilled using value account for(VAF),root mean square error(RMSE),determination coefficient(R2) and maximum relative error(MRE).As such,it is observed that the BPNN model is the most preferable model providing maximum accuracy and minimum error.Also,sensitivity analysis shows that inputs burden and stemming are the most effective parameters on the outputs fragmentation and backbreak,respectively.On the other hand,for both of the outputs,specific charge is the least effective parameter.
出处 《Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering》 SCIE CSCD 2013年第4期318-324,共7页 岩石力学与岩土工程学报(英文版)
关键词 Rock fragmentation Backbreak Artificial neural network Back propagation Radial basis function Rock fragmentation Backbreak Artificial neural network Back propagation Radial basis function
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1McCulloch W5, Pitts WHo A logical calculus of ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 1943;5(4):115-33.
  • 2Yang Y, Zhang Q, Analysis for the results of point load testing with artificial neu?ral network. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on computer methods and advances in geomechanics. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema; 1997a. p, 607-12.
  • 3Monjezi M, Rezaei M, Yazdian Varjani A. Prediction of rock fragmentation due to blasting in Gol-E-Gohar iron mine using fuzzy logic. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 2009;46(8):1273-80.
  • 4Monjezi M, Dehghani H. Evaluation of effect of blasting pattern parameters on backbreak using neural networks. International journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 2008;45(8):1446-53.
  • 5Khandelwal M, Singh TN. Evaluation of blast induced ground vibration predictors. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2007;27(2):116-25.
  • 6Konya Cj. Rock blasting and overbreak control. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: US Depart?ment of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration; 2003.
  • 7Konya CJ, Walter EJ. Rock blasting and overbreak control. 1 st ed. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration; 1991.
  • 8Khandelwal M, Singh TN. Prediction of blast induced air overpressure in opencast mine. Noise Vibration Worldwide 2005;36(2):7-16.
  • 9Gates W, Ortiz LT, Florez RM. Analysis of rockfall and blasting backbreak problems. In: Proceedings of the 40th u.s. symposium on rock mechanics. Alexandria, VA: American Rock Mechanics Association; 2005. p. 671-80.
  • 10Thornton D, Kanchibolta S5, Brunton 1. Modeling the impact and blast design vari?ation on blast fragmentation. International Journal of Fragmentation Blasting 2002;6(2):169-88.

同被引文献33

引证文献6

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部