期刊文献+

规范理论解释和结构实在论 被引量:1

Interpretation of Gauge Theory and Structural Realism
原文传递
导出
摘要 随着量子规范场论和粒子物理标准模型的成功,对规范理论进行解释成为了物理哲学和科学哲学的紧迫任务。目前,美国科学哲学家希利从经典规范理论的非局域规范势属性观角度发展和乐解释。遗憾的是,把这种和乐解释推广到量子化的规范场论时却遇到圈表象自身的困难,特别是和乐解释中的圈表象的非局域性跟量子力学福克表象中希尔伯特空间粒子的局域性不一致问题。论文在比较规范理论解释和量子引力的结构实在论解释基础上,根据建构性的结构实在论对和乐解释的困境进行分析,认为规范理论解释最好按照从量子规范理论到经典规范理论的路线可能找到新的出路,包括从中深究规范场论跟量子力学的关系问题。 With the great success of quantum gauge field theories and the Standard Model of particle physics, it has become a pressing task for philosophy of physics and philosophy of science to interpret the gauge theories. At present, Richard Healey, an American philosopher, has developed the holonomy interpretation from the viewpoint of the non-localized gauge potential properties view about classical gauge theories. Unfortunately, a problem of loop representations arises when we extend this interpretation from classical gauge theories to quantum gauge theories. A problem in particular is the inconsistency between the non-locality of loop representations and the locality of particle in Hilbert space of Fock representations of quantum mechanics. After we make a comparison between interpretation of gauge theory and constructive structural realism of quantum gravity, the article investigates these problems by the help of constructive structural realism. We think that the best strategy for resolving these problems is to select an interpreting route from quantum gauge theory to classical gauge theory. We will also research the relationship between gauge theory and quantum mechanics.
出处 《自然辩证法通讯》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第4期8-13,125,共6页 Journal of Dialectics of Nature
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(编号为12YJA720013) 中国博士后科学基金第四批特别资助 第四十七面上资助项目(编号分别为201104612和20100471582)
关键词 和乐解释 非局域性 结构实在论 量子化 Holonomy interpretation Non-locality Structural realism Quantization
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Healey, R., Gauging What's Reah The Conceptual Foundations of Contemporary Gauge Theories [M], Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2007.
  • 2Mandelstam, S., Quantum Eleetrodynamics without Potentials EJ], Annals of Physics, 1962, 19:1-24.
  • 3Ashtekar, A., Isham, C. J., Inequivalent Observable Algebras:A New Ambiguity in Field Quantisation[J], Physics Letters, 1992, B274: 393-398.
  • 4Stein, H., On the Notion of Field in Newton,Maxwell and Beyond[A], Stuewer,R.H.(Ed), Historical and Philosophical Perspectives of Science [C], Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1970, 285.
  • 5李继堂,郭贵春.当代规范理论语境中的科学实在论——以粒子物理的标准模型为案例[J].哲学动态,2009(8):78-83. 被引量:3
  • 6Cao, T. Y., Structural Realism and Quantum Gravity [A], Rickles, D., French, S., Saatsi. J.(Eds), The Structural Foundations of Quantum Gravity EC], Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2006, 40-52.

二级参考文献5

  • 1Paul Teller,An Interpretive Introduction to Quantum Field Theory, Princeton University Press, 1995.
  • 2Sunny Y. Auyang ,How is Quantum Field Theory Possible? Oxford University Press, 1995.
  • 3Richard Healey, Gauging What' s Real, Oxford University Press ,2007.
  • 4Tian Yu Cao,"Structural Realism and Quantum Gravity", In Dean Rickles,Steven French,Juha Saatsi (eds), The Structural Foundatios of Quantum Gravity, p. 46.
  • 5Exceeding Our Grasp : Science, History, and the Problem of Unconceived Alternative, Oxford University Press,2006.

共引文献2

同被引文献10

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部