期刊文献+

乐观主义-悲观主义量表在乳腺癌患者中应用的信效度研究 被引量:5

Reliability and Validity of the Optimism-pessimism Scale in Breast Cancer Patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:评估乐观主义一悲观主义量表(OPS)在乳腺癌患者中的信度、效度。方法:618例乳腺癌患者完成乐观主义一悲观主义量表、汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)和汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)的评估。结果:OPS的Cronbach’s α系数为0.901,乐观主义分量表和悲观主义分量表的Cronbach’s α系数分别为0.928和0.863:全量表的分半信度为0.730,两个分量表的分半信度为0.882和0.857:全量表的重测信度为0.847.两个分量表的重测信度为0.846和0.779;全量表的条目间平均相关系数为0.457,两个分量表的条目间相关系数分别为0.720、0.518。OPS与乐观主义、悲观主义两个分量表分之间的相关系数分别为一0.884、0.923.两个分量表之间的相关系数为一0.636。验证性因素分析结果显示为~2/dr=4.018,GFI=0.950,IFI=0.967.TLI=0.955.CFI=0.967,RMSEA=0.075。OPS的两个分量表得分与HAMA、HAMD量表得分均相关显著,相关系数范围为0.218~0.410。城市地区与农村地区乳腺癌患者在乐观主义和悲观主义得分上差异显著(P〈O.001);不同年龄组患者的得分仅在乐观主义分量表得分上有显著差异(P=-O.027)。结论:乐观主义一悲观主义量表(OPS)在乳腺癌患者中具有良好的信度、效度。 Objective: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Optimism-pessimism Scale (OPS) in breast cancer patients. Methods: 618 women with breast cancer were tested by Optimism-pessimism Scale, Hamilton Anxiety Scale and Hamilton Depression Scale. Results: The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the OPS total scale was 0.901, and the Cron- bach' s alpha coefficient of the two subscales of OPS were 0.928 and 0.863; the split-half reliability coefficient of the OPS was 0.730, and the split-half reliability coefficient of the two subscales were 0.882 and 0.857; the test-retest reliability of the OPS was 0.847, and the test-retest reliability of the two subscales were 0.846 and 0.779; the inter-item correlation co- efficient of the OPS was 0.457, and the inter-item correlation coefficient of the two subscales were 0.720 and 0.518. The correlation coefficients among the OPS and the subscales of OPS ranged from 0.636 to 0.923. The results of confirmatory factor analysis(x2/df=-4.018, GFI=0.950, IFI=0.967, TLI=0.955, CFI=0.967, RMSEA=0.075) all met the standard of psycho- metrics and supported the original OPS structural hypothesis of the two factor model. The correlation coefficients among the subscales of OPS, HAMA and HAMD ranged from 0.218 to 0.410. The scores of the two subscales of OPS were signif- icantly different between the urban area and the rural area (P〈0.001), only the scores of the Optimism Scale were signifi- cantly different among the age groups. Conclusion: The reliability and validity of the Optimism-Pessimism Scale are ac- ceptable, and the scale can effectively detect the breast cancer patients' optimism and pessimism tendency.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第4期576-578,582,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 国家科技支撑计划课题(2009BAI77B06)
关键词 乳腺癌 乐观主义 悲观主义 信度 效度 Breast lancer Optimism Pessimism Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Scheier MF, Carver CS. Optimism, coping, and health: Ass- essment and implications of generalized outcome expectan- cies. Health psychology, 1985, 4(3): 219.
  • 2Brissette I, Scheier MF, Carver CS. The role of optimism in social network development, coping, and psychological ad- justment during a life transition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002, 82(1): 102-111.
  • 3Carver CS, Pozo C, Harris SD, et al. How coping mediates the effect of optimism on distress: A study of women with early stage breast cancer. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1993, 65(2): 375.
  • 4Ah DV, Kang DH, Carpenter JS. Stress, optimism, and so- cial support: Impact on immune responses in breast cancer. Research in Nursing and Health, 2007, 30(1): 72-83.
  • 5袁立新,林娜,江晓娜.乐观主义-悲观主义量表的编制及信效度研究[J].广东教育学院学报,2007,27(1):55-59. 被引量:43
  • 6汪向东 王希林 等.心理卫生评定量表手册增订版[M].北京:中国心理卫生杂志社,1999.134-142,161-167.
  • 7Brown GW, Harris T. Social origins of depression: A study of psychiatric disorder in women. Routledge, 2001.
  • 8Briggs SR, Cheek JM. The role of factor analysis in the de- velopment and evaluation of personality scales. Journal of Personality, 1986, 54(1): 106-148.
  • 9Sorbom D. Model modification. Psychometrika, 1989, 54(3): 371-384.
  • 10McArdle JM, George WD, McArdle CS, et al. Psychological support for patients undergoing breast cancer surgery: A randomised study. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 1996, 312 (7034): 813.

二级参考文献34

  • 1Gajdos C,Tartter PI,Bleiweiss IJ,et al.Stage 0 to stage III breast cancer in young women[J].J Am Coll Surg,2000,190(5):523-529.
  • 2Colleoni M,Rotmensz N,Robertson C,et al.Very young women (<35 years) with operable breast cancer:features of disease at presentation[J].Ann Oncol,2002,13(2):273-279.
  • 3Foo CS,Su D,Chong CK,et al.Breast cancer in young Asian women:study on survival[J].ANZ J Surg,2005,75(7):566-572.
  • 4Bharat A,Aft RL,Gao F,et al.Patient and tumor characteristics associated with increased mortality in young women (<or=40 years) with breast cancer[J].J Surg Oncol,2009,100(3):248-251.
  • 5Huang HJ,Neven P,Drijkoningen M,et al.Association between HER-2/neu and the progesterone receptor in oestrogen-dependent breast cancer is age-related[J].Breast Cancer Res Treat,2005,91(1):81-87.
  • 6Rapiti E,Fioretta G,Verkooijen HM,et al.Survival of young and older breast cancer patients in Geneva from 1990 to 2001[J].Eur J Cancer,2005,41(10):1446-1452.
  • 7Love RR,Duc NB,Dinh NV,et al.Young age as an adverse prognostic factor in premenopausal women with operable breast cancer[J].Clin Breast Cancer,2002,2(4):294-298.
  • 8Wolff AC,Hammond ME,Schwartz JN,et al.American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer[J].Arch Pathol Lab Med,2007,131(1):18-43.
  • 9Wolff AC,Hammond ME,Schwartz JN,et al.American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer[J].J Clin Oncol,2007,25(1):118-145.
  • 10Goldhirsch A,Wood WC,Gelber RD,et al.Progress and promise:highlights of the international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2007[J].Ann Oncol,2007,18(7):1133-1144.

共引文献313

同被引文献66

引证文献5

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部