期刊文献+

补贴方式与均衡发展:战略性新兴产业成长与传统产业调整 被引量:42

Subsidies and Balanced Development:Growth of Strategic Emerging Industries and Adjustment of Traditional Industries
原文传递
导出
摘要 在一般均衡的框架下,本文使用特定要素模型从宏观角度研究了政府不同的补贴方式对于新兴产业和传统产业发展的影响。结果表明,当产业间存在着双向的知识溢出时,生产补贴在实现战略性新兴产业短期增长的同时,会对传统产业造成冲击,并且补贴带来的增长具有不可持续性,从长期来看还会阻碍整体经济的技术进步。另一方面,R&D补贴的效果取决于不同产业中研发活动的知识溢出效应,当研发活动仅对本产业的技术进步有促进作用时,针对该产业的R&D补贴在推动其发展的同时会抑制另一产业;当研发活动对所有产业存在很高的知识溢出效应时,针对该产业的R&D补贴可以实现所有产业的均衡发展。因此,政府对不同产业进行R&D补贴时,要根据战略性新兴产业与传统产业交替的不同发展阶段进行动态调整。 This paper uses a sector-specific model to analyze impacts of different subsidy policies on traditional and emerging industries respectively. We found that production subsidies may lead to short-term and unsustainable development of emerging industries at the cost of negative impact on traditional industries and technology progress of aggregate economy in the long run, when bilateral knowledge spillover exists between different industries. On the other hand, effect of R&D subsidies depends on characteristics of knowledge spillover. When R&D activities can only promote technology progress within the industry, industry-specific R&D subsidies will realize expanding of subsidized industry and shrinking of the other industry. But if R&D in one industry has strong knowledge spillover in both industries, R&D subsidies toward this industry will realize balanced growth of overall economy. Therefore, government should dynamically adjust R&D subsidy scheme according to characteristics of alternating between emerging and traditional industries in different stages of industrial upgrading.
作者 王宇 刘志彪
机构地区 南京大学商学院
出处 《中国工业经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第8期57-69,共13页 China Industrial Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"开源创新:基于互联网开放社区的分散创新模式"(批准号71103084) 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"扩大内需条件下提高长三角对外开放水平研究"(批准号11JJD790036)
关键词 补贴 新兴产业 研究与开发 知识溢出 subsidies emerging industries R&D knowledge spillover
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Porter, M. E. The Competitive Advantage of Nations[M]. New York: Free Press, 1990.
  • 2Gort, M., Klepper, S. Time Paths in the Diffusion of Product Innovation[J]. Economic Journal, 1982,367(92).
  • 3Klepper, S., Graddy, E. The Evolution of New Industries and the Determinants of Market Structure [J]. Rand Journal of Economics, 1990,21(1).
  • 4Low, M., Abrahamson, E. Movements, Bandwagons and Clones: Industry Evolution and Process [J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 1997,12(6).
  • 5Feldman, P., Kelley, R. The Ex Ante Assessment of Knowledge Spillovers: Government R&D Policy, Economic Incentives & Private Firm Behavior[J]. Research Policy, 2006,35(10).
  • 6Narayanan, K., Pinches, E., Kelm, M., Lander, M. The Influence of Voluntarily Disclosed Qualitative Information[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000,21(7).
  • 7Hall, B., Maffioli, A. Evaluating the Impact of Technology Development Funds in Emerging Economies: Evidence from Latin America[J]. European Journal of Development Research, 2008,20(2).
  • 8David, P., Hall, H., Toole, A. Is Public R&D a Complement or Substitute for Private R&D? A Review of the Econometric Evidence[J]. Research Policy, 2000,29(4-5).
  • 9Jones, W. A Three Factor Model in Theory, Trade and History, in Trade, Balance of Payments, and Growth [M]. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1971.
  • 10Dixit,K., Grossman, G. Targeted Export Promotion with Several Oligopolistic Industries [J]. Journal of International Economics, 1986,21(3-4).

二级参考文献156

共引文献645

同被引文献721

二级引证文献760

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部