期刊文献+

资源产权与道德的起源:演化博弈论的诠释 被引量:1

The Origin of Resources Property Rights and Moral: An Interpretation of Evolutionary Game Theory
原文传递
导出
摘要 论文在一个演化经济学视角下考察资源产权和道德(以下简称为产权和道德)自生自发问题。首先,简略地梳理了产权生发研究的历史;介绍了应用博弈论,特别是演化博弈论研究产权生发问题的近况,并指出其不足之处在于博弈支付的社会经济学含义模糊和无法揭示行为博弈与博弈环境相互作用、共同演化的过程。其次,扩展了生物遗传学中适应度的概念,使其适于社会演化分析;分析了社会经济学适应度的构成及其与竞争类型的关系。第三,为了说明行为博弈与博弈环境之间的相互作用关系,在传统复制者动态方程组中,引入状态方程(或组)。第四,采用改进后的复制者动态方程组分析产权和道德自生自发的机理和过程,指出产权和道德都是人类无节制争斗和无约束生育的产物。最后,分析了洛克社会的三大不足,及其继续演化的动力。 This article will investigate how resources property rights and moral emerge spontane- ously. First it will review the history of property rights briefly, introduce the applied Game Theo- ry, especially the recent research about the emergency of property rights through Evolutionary Game Theory. Then it will point out its deficiency which is too ambiguous about the socio-econom- ic meaning of pay-off to reveal the process of interaction and co-evolution between the Game and its environment. Second, it will expand the concept of fitness from the biological genetics to the a- nalysis of the social evolution; and analyze the constitution of socio-economic fitness which is re- lated to its type of competition. Third, it will introduce the condition equation into the traditional Replicator Dynamic Equation, to explain the interaction between Behavior Game and environment of the Game. Fourth, it will investigate how property rights and moral emerge spontaneously through improved Replicator Dynamic Equation, and point out that both property rights and moral were just the result of human' s intemperate battle and non-restraint multiplication. Finally, it will analyze three deficienies of Locker' s society, and its power to evolve continuously.
作者 陈安宁 朱喆
出处 《自然资源学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第8期1438-1450,共13页 Journal of Natural Resources
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"资源管理制度比较分析"(KYZ020205002)
关键词 演化博弈论 资源产权 行为范式 适应度 复制者动态方程 自然状态 evolutionary game theory resources property rights behavior paradigm fitness replicator dynamic equation state of nature
  • 相关文献

参考文献38

  • 1洛克.人类理解论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1983..
  • 2休谟.人性论[M].北京:商务印书馆,2004,6—8.
  • 3哈耶克.致命的自负[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2000..
  • 4Schlatter R B. Private Property: History of an Idea[M]. New York, Russell & Russell, 1973.
  • 5格劳秀斯.战争与和平法[M].何勤华,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2005.
  • 6洛克.政府论,瞿菊农,叶启芳译[M].北京:商务印书馆,2005.
  • 7卢梭.论人类不平等的起源和基础[M].李常山,何兆武,译.桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2002.
  • 8布坎南.财产与自由[M].韩旭,译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2002:5,7.
  • 9Rawls J. Thebasic structure as subject[C]//Goldman A, Kim J. Values and Morals. Boston, Reidel, 1978:47-71.
  • 10休谟.休谟政治论文选[M].张若衡,译.北京:商务印书馆,2010.

二级参考文献39

  • 1Kalai, E., and E. Lehrer, 1995, "Subjective Games and Equilibria", Games and Economic Behavior, 61 : pp1019-45.
  • 2Kaneko, M., Kline, J.J., 1999, "Inductive Game Theory: Discrimination and Prejudices", Journal of Public Economic Theory, 1 (1) : pp 101-37.
  • 3Kaneko, M., Kline, J.J., 2008, "Inductive Game Theory: A Basic Scenario", Journal of Mathematical Economics, 44: pp1332-1363.
  • 4Matsushima, H, 1998, "Towards a Theory of Subjective Games", Working Paper in Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
  • 5North, D, 2005, Understanding the Process of Institutional Change, Princeton University Press.
  • 6Oechssler Jorg and Schipper Burkhard, 2003, "Can You Guess the Game You Are Playing", Games and Economic Behavior, 43: pp137- 152.
  • 7Penard, Thierry, 2008, "Game Theory and Institutions", in Eric Brousseau and Jean-Michel Glachant, eds, New Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press.
  • 8Rubinstein, A, 1991, "Comments on the Interpretation of Game Theory", Econometrica, 59: pp909-924.
  • 9Selten, R, 1978, "The Chain Store Paradox", Theory and Decision, 9: pp127-159.
  • 10Schmidt, Christian, 2006, "Game Theory and Players Beliefs on the Play", Knowledge, Beliefs and Economics, 2, pp. 107-134.

共引文献1362

同被引文献4

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部