期刊文献+

不同表达粒度对城市路网结构健壮性评价的影响 被引量:4

The impact of different granularity representations on robustness evaluation of city road network
原文传递
导出
摘要 城市道路网络结构的健壮性评价需要定量化分析不同类型攻击对路网结构的影响。然而,城市路网拓扑结构在不同表达粒度下具有不同特征,对各种类型攻击的敏感性也存在差异。本文对城市道路网络进行不同表达粒度下的对偶图建模,并借鉴复杂网络中基于网络结构特征刻画的持续性模拟攻击方法,通过观测随机攻击和目的性攻击过程中城市路网结构的变化过程,评估不同表达粒度对城市路网结构健壮性评价的影响。研究选择了6个不同空间形态的城市路网作为实验路网。结果表明,在相同表达粒度下,对于随机攻击或目的性攻击,不同形态的城市路网结构变化过程具有相似特征,但同一城市路网在不同表达粒度下,受到攻击时的结构演变特征有较大差异。因此面向不同应用时需要选择合适的表达粒度来评价路网健壮性。路段粒度适用于评价点状事件造成的交通中断对路网的影响,可以为突发事故应急方案的制定提供依据;路链粒度适用于评价线状事件如整条道路交通管制或改为单行线时对路网的影响,可以辅助交通管理部门制定合理的交通管制方案;社区粒度适用于评价影响范围较大的交通事件如大型文体活动等面状事件对城市交通的影响,同时该表达粒度顾及了道路交通的区域联动,更适用于动态交通环境下的路网健壮性评价。 Robustness analysis of city road networks requires the evaluation of structural change in networks under attacks.The difficulty of robustness analysis is that when modeled at different granularities city road network structures have different characteristics and show different sensitivities to various attacks.In this article,a city road network is first modeled as dual graph at three different granularities.Then,a series of successive simulated attacks are designed based on network structure characterization methods from complex network theory.The robustness analysis is carried out by characterizing the structural change of a city road network under these successive simulated attacks.Six world cities with different urban morphology forms are tested.The results show that at the same granularity,the performances of different city road network under attacks are similar.However,at different granularities,a city road network has quite different performance.Thus,it is important to choose appropriate representation granularity when conducting robustness analysis of city road network for a specific application.We argue that road network represented by segment is suitable for the evaluation on how traffic interruption at certain point affects the network and can provide suggestion on related emergency response.Road network represented by stroke is a good option when we want to evaluate how filiform traffic interruption affects the network and can help to decide traffic control strategies.Road network represented by community is more suitable for robustness analysis under the condition of big events that affect the traffic in a larger area.Moreover,community is an appropriate representation for robustness analysis in dynamic traffic environment since the zonal road traffic interactions could be taken into account.
作者 段滢滢 陆锋
出处 《中国图象图形学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2013年第9期1197-1205,共9页 Journal of Image and Graphics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(41271408) 国家高技术研究发展计划(863)项目(2012AA12A211 2013AA120305)
关键词 城市路网 健壮性 表达粒度 复杂网络 社区发现 city road network robustness analysis representation granularity complex network community detection
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Yin Y, Madanat S M, Lu X Y. Robust improvement schemes Ibr road networks under demand uncertainty [ J. Emxpean Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 198 (2) : 470-479. [ DOl: 10. 1016/j. ejor. 2008.09. 008].
  • 2Jenelius E, Petersen T, Mattsson L G. hnportance and exposure in road network vulnerability analysis [ J]. Transportation Re- search Part A: Policy and Practice, 2006, 40 (7) : 537-560.
  • 3Baran P. On distributed communications networks [ Jl. IEEE Transactions on Communications Systems, 1964, 12 ( 1 ) : 1-9.
  • 4Demgar U, patenkov 0, Virrantaus K, Identifying critical loca- tions in a spatial network with graph theory [ J]. Transactions in GIS, 2008, 12 ( 1 ): 61-82.
  • 5Costa L F, Rodrigues F A, Travieso G, et al. Characterization of complex networks: a survey of measurements [ J]. Advances in Physics, 2007, 56 (1 ): 167-242.
  • 6Holme P, Kim B J, Yoon C N, et al. Attack vulnerability of complex networks [ J ] . Physical Review E, 2002, 65 ( 5 ) : 56109. [DOI: 10. 1103/PhysRevE. 65. 056109].
  • 7Albert R, Albert I, Nakarado G L. Structural vulnerability of the north american power grid [ J ]. Physical Review E, 2004, 69 (2) : 25103. [DOI : 10. 1103/PhysRevE. 69. 025103 ].
  • 8Yazdani A, Jeffrey P. Complex network analysis of water distri- bution systems [J]. Chaos, 2011, 21 (1): 16111. IDOl: 10. 1063/1. 3540339].
  • 9Jenelius E. Network structure and travel patterns: explaining the geographical disparities of road network vulnerability [ J ]. Jour- nal of Transport Geography, 2009, 17 (3) : 234-244. [DOI: 10. 1016/j. jtrangeo. 2008.06. 002].
  • 10张勇,杨晓光.城市路网的复杂网络特性及可靠性仿真分析[J].系统仿真学报,2008,20(2):464-467. 被引量:46

二级参考文献38

  • 1高自友,吴建军,毛保华,黄海军.交通运输网络复杂性及其相关问题的研究[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2005,5(2):79-84. 被引量:94
  • 2高自友,赵小梅,黄海军,毛保华.复杂网络理论与城市交通系统复杂性问题的相关研究[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2006,6(3):41-47. 被引量:95
  • 3刘勇,项莉,谢军,严宝杰.城市路网可靠性计算方法[J].交通运输工程学报,2007,7(3):95-99. 被引量:16
  • 4Batty M,Longley P.Fractal Cities:a Geometry of Form and Function[M].London,San Diego:Academic Press,1994.
  • 5Wilson G A.Complex Spatial Systems:the Modeling Foundations of Urban and Regional Analysis[M].Upper Saddle River,NJ:Prentice-Hall,2000.
  • 6Jiang B,Claramunt C.Topological analysis of urban street networks[J].Environment and Planning B:Planning and Design,2003,31(1):151-162.
  • 7Jiang B,Claramunt C.A structural approach to the model generalization of an urban street network[J].Geoinformatica,2004,8(2):157-171.
  • 8Jiang B.A topological pattern of urban street networks:universality and peculiarity[J].Physica A,2007,384:647-655.
  • 9Buhl J,Gautrais J,Reeves N,et al.Topological patterns in street networks of self-organized urban settlements[J].Euro Phys J B,2006,49:513-522.
  • 10Crucitti P,Latora V,Porta S.Centrality in networks of urban streets[J].Chaos,2006,16:015113.

共引文献72

同被引文献46

  • 1邓敏,刘文宝,冯学智.GIS面目标间拓扑关系的形式化模型[J].测绘学报,2005,34(1):85-90. 被引量:35
  • 2金凤君,王成金.轴-辐侍服理念下的中国航空网络模式构筑[J].地理研究,2005,24(5):774-784. 被引量:167
  • 3刘宏鲲,周涛.中国城市航空网络的实证研究与分析[J].物理学报,2007,56(1):106-112. 被引量:144
  • 4钱海忠,武芳,朱鲲鹏,王辉连,王家耀.一种基于降维技术的街区综合方法[J].测绘学报,2007,36(1):102-107. 被引量:20
  • 5LI W,CAI X.Statistical analysis of airport network of China[J].Physical Review E,2004,69:046106.
  • 6ELLISON R J,FISHER D A,LINGER R C,et al.Survivable network systems:An emerging discipline[R].Carnegie-mellon Univ Pittsburgh PA Software Engineering Inst,1997.
  • 7谭跃进,吕欣,吴俊.复杂网络抗毁性研究若干问题的思考[J].系统工程理论与实践,2008,28(增刊):116-120.
  • 8DUAN Y Y,LU F.Structural robustness of city road networks based on community[J].Computers,Environment and Urban Systems,2013,41:75-87.
  • 9ZHANG J,XU X,HONG L,et al.Networked analysis of the Shanghai subway network,in China[J].Physica A:Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications,2011,390(23):4562-4570.
  • 10ALBERT R,JEONG H,BARABSI A L.Error and attack tolerance of complex networks[J].Nature,2000,406(6794):378-382.

引证文献4

二级引证文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部