期刊文献+

2种基于锥形束CT的头影测量软件测定常用角度值的比较 被引量:2

Comparison of general angle magnitudes measured using two kinds of cephalometric measuring software
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较三维测量软件与Winceph 8.0测量软件测定出的头颅侧位片中的常用角度值。方法对40名需要正畸的患者进行锥形束CT(CBCT)扫描。在Invivo Dental 5.0软件中,按照统一条件将CBCT数据转化为头颅侧位片。选择数个常用角度值,分别通过三维测量软件与Winceph 8.0测量软件进行定点测量。对三维测量软件与Winceph 8.0测量软件定点测量所得的数据进行统计分析。结果 2种测量软件测定出的头颅侧位片中的常用角度值大部分无明显差异。结论该研究为三维测量软件的广泛运用提供支持。 Objective To investigate and compare the general angles on coronal lateral position using a three- dimensional analyzing software and the conventional Winceph 8.0 software. Methods Forty pre-orthodontic patients were radiographed with cone-beam computed tomography(CBCT) techniques. According to the identical condition, CBCT data were converted to cephalograms using Invivo Dental 5.0 software. Certain landmarks were measured using the three- dimensional analyzing software and Winceph 8.0, and the measurements were repeated twice for each method. All data were subjected to statistical analysis, and rank sum test was used to determine the difference between the three-dimensional analyzing software and Winceph 8.0. Results No obvious differences on the general angle magnitudes at the coronal lateral position were observed between the three-dimensional analyzing software and Winceph 8.0. Conclusion The results from the measurement by the two methods did not show significant differences. This finding indicates that the three-dimensional analyzing software and Winceph 8.0 exhibit the same performance. Moreover, the three-dimensional analyzing software indicated distinct superiority on certain landmarks.
出处 《国际口腔医学杂志》 CAS 2013年第5期592-594,共3页 International Journal of Stomatology
基金 辽宁省自然科学基金资助项目(201202235)
关键词 三维测量软件 锥形束CT 角度 three-dimensional analyzing software cone-beam computed tomography angle
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1刘怡.锥束CT的发展与临床应用[J].口腔正畸学,2008,15(4):189-192. 被引量:23
  • 2Mori Y, Miyajima T, Minami K, et al. An accurate three-dimensional cephalometric system: A solution for the correction of cephalic malpositioning[J]. J Orthod, 2001, 28(2): 143-149.
  • 3Maal T J, Plooij JM, Rangel FA, et al. The accuracy of matching three-dimensional photographs with skin surfaces derived from cone-beam computed tomography[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2008, 37(7):641-646.
  • 4Periagoa DR, Scarfeb WC, Moshiric M, et al. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an ortho- dontic volumetric rendering program[J]. Angle Or- thod, 2008, 78(3):387-395.
  • 5Lascala CA, Panella J, Marques MM. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography(CBCT-New-Tom) [J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2004, 33(5): 291-294.
  • 6Lagravere MO, Major PW. Proposed reference point for 3-dimensional cephalometric analysis with cone- beam computerized tomography[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2005, 128(5):657-660.

共引文献22

同被引文献33

  • 1曹鸿涛,王美青.颞下颌关节的放射影像学检查新进展[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2001,17(z1):24-26. 被引量:1
  • 2孟娟红,张万林,柳登高,赵燕平,马绪臣.牙颌面锥形束CT与普通X线检查对颞下颌关节骨关节病诊断价值的比较研究[J].北京大学学报(医学版),2007,39(1):26-29. 被引量:42
  • 3王瑞永,马绪臣,张万林,柳登高.健康成年人颞下颌关节间隙锥形束计算机体层摄影术测量分析[J].北京大学学报(医学版),2007,39(5):503-506. 被引量:58
  • 4Zamora N, Llamas JM, Cibri6n R, et al. Cephalometric measurements from 3D reconstructed images compared with conventional 2D images[ J]. Angle Orthod, 2011, 81 (5) : 856 - 864.
  • 5Hassan B, van der Stelt P, Sanderink G. Accuracy of three- dimensional measurements obtained from cone beam compu- ted tomography surface-rendered images for cephalometric a- nalysis: Influence of patient scanning position [ J ]. Eur J Orthod, 2009, 31(2):129-134.
  • 6Gribel BF, Gribel MN, Fraziio DC, et al. Accuracy and re- liability of craniometric measurements on lateral cephalome- try and 3D measurements on CBCT scans [ J]. Angle Orth- od, 2011, 81(1):26-35.
  • 7Park SH, Yu HS, Kim KD, et al. A proposal for a new a- nalysis of craniofacial morphology by 3-dimensional compu- ted tomofffaphy [ J ]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2006, 129(5) : 600.
  • 8Katkar RA, Kummet C, Dawson D, et al. Comparison of observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric land- mark identification on subject images from Galileos and i- CAT cone beam CT. [ J]. Dentomaxillofac Radio1, 2013, 42(9) :20130059.
  • 9Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial ra- diology[ J ]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2008, 106( 1 ) :106 - 114.
  • 10Kumar V, Ludlow J, Soares Cevidanes LH, et al. In vivo comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms [ J 1. Angle Orthod, 2008, 78 ( 5 ) : 873 - 879.

引证文献2

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部