期刊文献+

2种对比剂对冠脉介入患者肾功能的影响

Influences of two contrast media on renal function in PCI patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察等渗及低渗对比剂对Mehran危险评分中高危患者肾功能的影响。方法应用Mehran危险评分系统对拟行介入患者进行评估,选取中高危患者(评分≥6分)182例。随机分为碘克沙醇组89例和碘普罗胺组93例,分别应用相应对比剂,冠脉介入术前及术后48 h、7 d检测血肌酐峰值水平,比较2组对比剂肾病发生率及不良事件发生率。结果 182例患者皆进入结果分析。冠脉介入术后48 h 2组患者血清肌酐峰值水平存在显著性差异(P<0.05);7 d时2组患者肌酐水平无显著性差异。对比剂肾病发生率碘克沙醇组7.9%,碘普罗胺组18.3%,2组比较有显著性差异(P<0.05)。2组患者不良反应事件发生率比较无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论对于中高危患者,应用等渗对比剂比低渗对比剂能减少对比剂肾病的发生率。 Objective It is to observe the influence of low-osmosis contrast medium and iso-osmosis contrast medium on kidney function of high-risk patients of Mehran risk score. Methods 182 high-risk patients estimated by Mehran risk score system ( score 〉16) were selected, and were divided randomly into iodixanol group with 89 cases and iopromide group with 93 cases. All the patients underwent homologue contrast medium before percutaneous coronary intervention. The serum creatinine levels before angiography, 48 hours and 7 day after admission were measured. The rate of contrast medium induced nephropathy (CIN) and adverse events in both groups were observed and compared. Results 182 patients were involved the result analysis. On the hours 48 after operation, serum creatinine levels of two groups were different (P〈0.05) ; on the day 7, the differences between the two groups were not significant (P 〉0.05). The rate of CIN was 7.9% in experimental group and 18.3% in control group, there was significant difference between them (P 〈 0.05) ; there was no significant difference in rate of adverse reaction between the two groups (P 〉 0.05). Conclusion For high risk patients the rate of CIN may be less likely to develop when iodixanol is used, rather than low-osmolar contrast media iopromide.
出处 《现代中西医结合杂志》 CAS 2013年第24期2638-2640,共3页 Modern Journal of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine
关键词 对比剂 危险因素 Mehran危险评分 经皮腔内冠脉血管成形术 contrast media risk factors Mehran risk score system percutaneous coronary intervention
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Mehran R,Aymong ED,Nikolsky E,et al.A simple risk score for prediction of contrast induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention:development and initial validation[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2004,44(7):1393-1399.
  • 2Mautone A,Brown JR.Contrast induced nephropathy in patients undergoing elective and urgent procedures[J].Interv Cardiol,2010,23(1):78-85.
  • 3Dangas G,Iakovou I,Nikolsky E,et al.Contrast induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary interventions in relation to chronic kidney disease and hemodynamic variables[J].Am J Cardiol,2005,95(1):13-19.
  • 4Stacul F,Vander Molen AJ,Reimer P,et al.Contrast induced nephropathy:updated ESUR Contrast Media Safety Committee guidelines[J].Eur Radiol,2011,21(12):2527-4125.
  • 5Rudnick MR,Kesselheim A,Goldfarb S.Contrast induced nephropathy:how it develops,how to prevent it[J].Cleve Clin J Med,2006,73(1):75-80.
  • 6Becker J,Babb J,Serrano M.Glomerular filtration rate in evaluation of the effect of iodinated contrast media on renal function[J].AJR Am J Roentgenol,2013,200(4):822-826.
  • 7Reed MC,Moscucci M,Smith DE,et al.The relative renal safety of iodixanol and low osmolar contrast media in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.Insights from Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2)[J].J Invasive Cardiol,2010,22(10):467-472.
  • 8Reed M,Meier P,Tamhane UU,et al.The relative renal safety of iodixanol compared with low osmolar contrast media:a meta analysis of randomized controlled trials[J].JACC Cardiovasc Interv.2009 Jul;2(7):645-654.
  • 9张晓伟,盛力,李悦,李俭强,赵继义,李天开,刘宇坦,李为民.不同类型对比剂对急性冠脉综合征患者PCI术后肾功能的影响[J].中国急救医学,2012,32(4):357-359. 被引量:7
  • 10李艳华,张丽莉,赵春雁.等渗及低渗造影剂对高危患者发生造影剂肾病的比较[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2008,12(4):683-686. 被引量:12

二级参考文献29

  • 1Rudnick MR, Goldfarb S, Wexler L, et al. Nephrotoxicity of ionic and nonionic contrast media in 1196 patients: a randomized trial: the lohexol Cooperative Study. Kidney lnt 1995;47(1):254-26.
  • 2Berg KJ. Nephrotoxicity related to contrast media. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2000;34(5):317-322.
  • 3Taliercio CP, Vlietstra RE, llstrup DM, et al. A randomized comparison of the nephrotoxicity of iopamidol and diatrizoate in high risk patients undergoing cardiac angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;17(2):384-390.
  • 4Nash K, Hafeez A, Hou S. Hospital-acquired. Renal insufficiency. Am J Kidney Dis 2002;39(5):930-936.
  • 5Scott JA, King GL. Oxidative stress and antioxidant treatment in diabetes. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2004;1031:204-213.
  • 6Morcos SK, Thomsen HS, Webb JA. Contrast-media-induced nephrotoxicity: a consensus report. Eur Radiol 1999;9(8): 1602-1613.
  • 7Katzberg RW. Urography into the 21st century: new contrast media, renal handling, imaging characteristics, and nephrotoxicity. Radiology 1997;204(2):297-312.
  • 8Briguori C, Airoldi F, D'Andrea D, et al. Renal Insufficiency Following Contrast Media Administration Trial(REMEDIAL): a randomized comparison of 3 preventive strategies. Circulation 2007;115(10):1211-1217.
  • 9Hall KA, Wong RW, Hunter GC, et al. Contrast-induced nephrotoxicity: the effects of vasodilator therapy. J Surg Res 1992;53(4):317-320.
  • 101xJH, McCulloch CE, Chertow GM. Theophylline for the prevention of radiocontrast nephropathy: a meta-analysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004; 19(11 ):2747 -2753.

共引文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部