期刊文献+

NISS在肾损伤治疗方案选择及预后判断中的意义 被引量:1

Significance of New Injury Severity Score in renal injury treatment options and prognosis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨新损伤严重度评分(NISS)在肾损伤治疗方案选择及预后判断中的意义。方法:采用NISS对186例肾损伤患者治疗方案的选择及转归进行回顾性分析及评估。结果:开放性损伤手术探查率高于闭合性损伤(P〈0.01),开放性损伤与闭合性损伤NISS差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);NISS评分与治疗方案有关,手术率及肾切除率随NISS增加而增加,各组间差异有统计学意义(均P〈0.05);随损伤部位数增加,损伤程度加重,NISS值升高,死亡率也升高(P〈0.05)。结论:NISS总分〈15分的伤情一般较轻,经保守治疗多可痊愈;NISS总分在15~34分之间,损伤程度为中度,推荐积极手术抢救;NISS总分在35~49分多为重型复合伤,建议在纠正休克及改善全身情况的基础上选择手术治疗,总分≥50分者不建议手术。 Objective:To explore the significance of New Injury Severity Score (NISS) in renal injury treatment options and prognosis. Method: The treatment options and prognosis of 186 cases with renal injury were retrospec tively analyzed and evaluated by NISS. Result: The open injury operation rate was higher than the blunt renal trauma (P〈0.01) . NISS score was no significant difference between open injury and closed renal injury (P〉0.05) . NISS score and treatment scheme were closely related. With NISS score increased, operation rate and renal resec tion rate increased accordingly. There was a significant difference between groups (P〈0.05, P〈0.05) . With the injury site and injury severity increased, NISS levels and mortality increased accordingly (P〈0.05). Conclusion:Firstly NISS scores 〈15, patients conditions are light and most of them can be cured after conservative treat ment. Secondly NISS scores are between 15 34 points, the damages are moderate, proactive operation rescue shoule be recommended. Thirdly NISS score are between 35 49 points, operation treatments can be chosen based on correction of shock and improvement of general condition. And lastly NISS scores≥50 no operations are rec ommended.
出处 《临床泌尿外科杂志》 2013年第9期679-681,共3页 Journal of Clinical Urology
关键词 肾损伤 新损伤严重度评分 治疗方案 预后 renal injury New Injury Severity Score treatment scheme prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Susantitaphong P, Siribamrungwong M, Doi K, et al. Performance of urinary liver-type fatty acid-binding protein in acute kidney injury: a meta-analysis[J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 2013, 61(:3):430-439.
  • 2朱文海,管军,周雄驹,陆进,诸伟.210例闭合性肾损伤的治疗[J].中华创伤杂志,2011,27(10):936-937. 被引量:4
  • 3Thomas M, Sitch A, Dowswell G. The initial develop ment and assessment of an automatic alert warning of acute kidney injury [J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2011, 26(7):2161-2168.
  • 4Anja, Nicholas, and Axel. Biomarkers of kidney injury [J]. Biomarkers, 2011, 16(Suppl 1):S22-30.
  • 5王家平,柯昌兴,李迎春,袁曙光,闫东,王剑松,童玉云,朱全胜.超选择性肾动脉栓塞治疗肾损伤出血72例[J].中华创伤杂志,2009,25(4):344-345. 被引量:1
  • 6Liang X, Chen Y, Zhuang J, et al. Advanced oxidation protein products as progno.4tic biomarkers for recovery from acute kidney injury after coronary artery bypass grafting[J]. Biomarkers, 2012, 17(6) :507-512.
  • 7王淑琴,晏香,王丽华.新损伤严重度评分在多发伤救护中的应用[J].解放军护理杂志,2011,28(2):49-50. 被引量:11
  • 8Prowle J, Bagshaw SM, Bellomo R. Renal blood flow, fractional excretion of sodium and acute kidney injury: time for a new paradigm[J]? Curr Opin Crit Care, 2012, 18(6): 585-592.
  • 9Gong Y, Xu H, Xu Z, et al. Comparison of prognostic value of two kinds of severity scoring systems for hos pital mortality prediction ofelderly patients with acute kidney injury[J]. Aging Clin Exp Res, 2012, 24(1): 74-78.
  • 10Trnka P, Hiatt M J, Tarantal A F, et al. Congenital urinary tract obstruction: de{ining markers of develop- mental kidney injury[J]. Pediatr Res, 2012, 72 (5): 446-454.

二级参考文献12

共引文献13

同被引文献18

  • 1Tohira Hideo, Jacobs Ian, Mountain David, et al. Comparisons of the outcome prediction performance of injury severity sco- ring tools using the abbreviated injury scale 90 update 98 ( AIS 98) and 2005 update 2008 ( AIS 2008 ) [ J ]. Ann Adv Automot Med, 2011,55:255 - 265.
  • 2Wang M D, Fan W H, Qiu W S, et al. The exponential func- tion transforms the Abbreviated Injury Scale, which both im- proves accuracy and simplifies scoring [ J ]. European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery,2014,40(3) :121 - 127.
  • 3Staff T, Eken T, Wik L, et al. Physiologic, demographic and mechanistic factors predicting New Injury Severity Score (NISS) in motor vehicle accident victims [ J ]. Injury,2012, 45(1) :9 - 15.
  • 4Trine Staff,Torsten Eken,Trond Boye Hansen,et al. A field evaluation of real - life motor vehicle accidents : presence of unrestrained objects and their association with distribution and severity of patient injuries [ J ]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2012,45 : 529 - 538.
  • 5Savage S A, Zarzaur B L, Croce M A, et al. Redefining massive transfusion when every second counts [ J ]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg,2013,74 ( 2 ) :396 - 400.
  • 6Brattstrom O, Granath F, Rossi P, et al. Early predictors of morbidity and mortality in trauma patients treated in the in- tensive care unit [ J ]. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2010,54(8) : 1007 - 1017.
  • 7Belzunegui Tomas, Gradin Carlos, Fortfin Mariano, et al. The accuracy of different survival prediction models [ J]. Ameri- can Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2013,31 ( 9 ) : 1382 - 1388.
  • 8Ramasamy A, Evans S, Kendrew J M, et al. The open blast pelvis: the significant burden of management [ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg Br,2012,94(6) :829 -835.
  • 9徐建国,潘娅静,赵洁.严重创伤患者改良的全身炎症反应综合征评分与损伤严重度评分相关性分析[J].中国急救医学,2011,31(9):844-846. 被引量:9
  • 10孔令文,卢仁福,谭远康,苏泓洁,张为民,赵兴吉,都定元.应用ISS和NISS评估伴严重胸部损伤的多发伤患者并发症与救治结局[J].中华创伤杂志,2012,28(7):580-583. 被引量:21

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部