期刊文献+

干旱胁迫对持绿性高粱叶片渗透调节及叶绿体超微结构的影响 被引量:15

Impacts of drought stress on leaf osmotic adjustment and chloroplast ultrastructure of stay-green sorghum
原文传递
导出
摘要 在盆栽条件下,研究了开花期和灌浆期干旱胁迫(土壤含水量为田间最大持水量的45%~50%)对持绿性高粱(B35)和非持绿性高粱(三尺三)叶片水分、渗透调节物质以及叶绿体超微结构的影响.结果表明:干旱胁迫下,两高梁品系叶片自由水含量下降,束缚水含量增加,相对含水量降低,水分饱和亏缺增加,相对电导率增大,但三尺三各指标的变化幅度均大于B35.对于渗透调节物质,干旱胁迫下,三尺三可溶性糖含量的增幅大于B35,脯氨酸含量的增幅小于B35,可溶性蛋白含量的降幅大于B35.干旱胁迫下,B35与三尺三的叶绿体超微结构均受到一定程度的破坏,但B35叶绿体结构保持相对完好,受损程度明显小于三尺三.在干旱胁迫下,持绿性高粱通过较强的渗透调节表现出更好的干旱适应能力. Taking stay-green sorghum (B35) and non-stay green sorghum (Sanchisan) as test ma- terials, a pot experiment was conducted to study their leaf osmotic adjustment and chloroplast ultra- structure at flowering and filling stages under impacts of drought stress (45%-50% of maximum field capacity). For the two sorghum lines, drought stress caused the reduction of their leaf free wa- ter content and relative water content, and increased the leaf bound water content, water saturation deficit, and electrical conductivity, with the increment or dement being larger for Sanchisan than for B35. Drought stress increased the leaf soluble sugar content and proline content, with the increment of the soluble sugar content being larger for Sanehisan and the increment of the proline content being larger for B35, while decreased the leaf soluble protein content, with the decrement being larger for Sanchisan than for B35. The chloroplast uhrastructure of both B35 and Sanchisan under drought stress was damaged to some extent, but the damaged degree was obviously lower for B35 than for Sanchisan. The findings indicated that stay-green sorghum had a greater adaptation to drought stress through stronger osmotic adjustment.
出处 《应用生态学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第9期2545-2550,共6页 Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology
基金 现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-06-02-02) 高等学校博士学科点科研基金项目(20092103120009)资助
关键词 持绿性 干旱胁迫 高粱 渗透调节 叶绿体 stay-green drought stress sorghum osmotic adjustment chloroplast.
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

  • 1Thomas H, Howarth CJ. Five ways to stay green. Jour-nal of Experimental Botany, 2000, 51: 329-337.
  • 2黄瑞冬.作物持绿性的遗传、生理基础及其应用前景[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2008,39(4):387-391. 被引量:15
  • 3Lobell DB, Field CB. Global scale climate-crop yieldrelationships and the impacts of recent warming. Envi-ronmental Research Letters,2007,2: 1-7.
  • 4Hlavinka P, Tmka M, Semeradova D,et al. Effect ofdrought on yield variability of key crops in Czech Repub-lic. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2009, 149 :431-442.
  • 5Stout DG,Simpson GM. Drought resistance of Sorghumbicolor. I. Drought avoidance mechanisms related to leafand water status. Canadian Journal of Plant Science,1978,58: 213 - 224.
  • 6Rosenow DT, Clark LE. Drought tolerance in sorghum.Proceedings of 36th Annual Com and Sorghum IndustryResearch Conference, Chicago, 1981 : 18-31.
  • 7黄瑞冬,孙璐,肖木辑,许文娟,周宇飞.持绿型高粱B35灌浆期对干旱的生理生化响应[J].作物学报,2009,35(3):560-565. 被引量:19
  • 8Henzell RG, Brengman RL, Fletcher DS, et al. Rela-tionships between yield and non-senescence ( stay-green ).in some grain sorghum hybrids grown under ter-minal drought stress. Proceedings of the Second Austral-ian Sorghum Conference, Gatton,1992: 355-358.
  • 9Rosenow DT, Quisenberry JE, Wendt CW, et al.Drought tolerant sorghum and cotton germplasm. Agri-cultural Water Management, 1983,7: 207-222.
  • 10Campos H, Cooper M, Habben JE, et al. Improvingdrought tolerance in maize: A view from industry. FieldCrops Research,2004,90: 19-34.

二级参考文献143

共引文献729

同被引文献228

引证文献15

二级引证文献153

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部