美国高等教育研究的研究:以Res High Educ期刊为例被引量：2

A Study of American Higher Education:Taking Res High Educ as the Case

下载PDF

导出

摘要《高等教育研究》(Research in Higher Education)是美国最重要、最具代表性的高等教育研究期刊。对该期刊2006-2010年间论文的作者群、研究方法、研究选题等方面特征的分析表明,它的核心作者群主要分布在发达国家,尤以美国居多;且高度重视数据调查法等定量研究方法,重点研究本科生教学、大学绩效和组织氛围、少数族裔学生等关涉学生、质量、绩效、公平的问题。与此相比较,中国高等教育研究的作者群中,拥有高等教育管理者身份的研究者表现异常活跃;在研究方法领域,方法意识比较混乱、方法运用相对滞后;在研究选题方面,"高等教育理论"和"学校管理"等是重要的论题。对比美国高等教育的研究状况,中国大陆高等教育研究的深化与完善,任重而道远。 Research in Higher Edu cation is the most important,representative and influential periodical in US.By the analysis of its paper from 2006 to 2010,this study indicates that many of the writers are distributed in the developed countries,most of them are in US.Moreover,the main research mehods are quantitative research such as data investigation and so on.And the contents are mainly undergraduate teaching,administration of higher education,minorities,and are concerned with student,quality,and equity.Comparing to this,writers of the Chinese higher education research are mainly administrators of higher education.As for the research methods,there is not many quantitative research.As for the contents,many of them are theories of higher education and school administration.Therefore,by comparing the research of higher education between China and US we can see that there is a long way for improving Chinese higher education reaearch.

作者郑文宋春燕陈伟

机构地区华南师范大学教育科学学院

出处《华南师范大学学报（社会科学版）》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第4期21-28,159,共8页 Journal of South China Normal University：Social Science Edition

关键词 RES HIGH Educ 国际高等教育研究比较启示 Res High Educ international higher education research comparison enlightenment

分类号 G64 [文化科学—高等教育学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献22

1Susan R. Hutchinson, Cheryl D. Lovell. A Review of Ethod- ological Characteristics of Research Published in Key Journals in Higher Education : Implications for Graduate Research Training. Research in Higher Education, 2004,45(4).
2John M. Budd. A Bibliometric Analysis of Higher Education Literature. Research in Higher Education, 1988,28 (2).
3Robert B. Archibald, David H. Fddman. Graduation Rates and Accountability: Regressions Versus Production Frontiers. Research in Higher Education, 2008,49( 1 ).
4易高峰,刘盛博,赵文华.《高等教育研究》研究热点及其知识基础图谱分析[J].高等教育研究,2009,30(10):74-80. 被引量：88
5龚放.中国教育研究领域学者、论著影响力报告——基于2005-2006年CSSCI的统计分析[J].复旦教育论坛,2009,7(2):35-45. 被引量：25
6Philip A. Trostel, Justin M. Ronca. A Simple Unifying Meas- ure of State Support for Postsecondary Education. Research in Higher Education,2009,50( 3 ).
7David A. Tandberg. Politics, Interest Groups and State Fun- ding of Public Higher Education. Research in Higher Educa- tion, 2010,51 (5).
8Robert D. Renaud, Harry G. Murray. The Falldity of Higher -order Questions as a Process Indicator of Educatioaal Quali- ty. Research in Higher Education, 2007,48 ( 3 ).
9Robert B. Archibald, David H. Feldman. Graduation Rates and Accountability: Regressions Versus Production Frontiers. Research in Higher Education, 2008,49 ( 1 ).
10Matthew J. Mayhew, Hedi E. Grunwald, Eric L. Dey. Break- ing the Silence :Achieving a Positive Campus Climate for Diversi- ty from the Staff Perspective. Research in Higher Education, 2006, 47(1).