期刊文献+

湿片镜检法与革兰染色镜检法在诊断细菌性阴道病中的比较

Comparison of Film Microscopy and Gram Staining Microscopic Inspection in the Diagnose Bacterial Vaginosi
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 比较湿片镜检法与革兰染色镜检法在诊断细菌性阴道病(bacterial vaginosis,BV)的应用.方法 收集2011年8月~11月经BV速蓝试剂检验结果为阳性的阴道分泌物标本406例进行湿片直接镜检线索细胞;随机选取406例中的210例标本进行革兰染色后镜检线索细胞.两种方法的结果判断以镜下线索细胞≥20%为标准,凡符合此标准的认为与BV速蓝试剂阳性结果符合.结果 406例湿片镜检标本中243例符合判断标准.210例革兰染色镜检标本中127例符合判断标准;湿片镜检法与革兰染色镜检法的符合率分别为59.85%,60.48%,统计结果显示二者差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.22,V=1,P=0.881).结论 湿片镜检法与革兰染色镜检法在检测线索细胞、辅助诊断细菌性阴道病方面无明显差异,湿片直接镜检是较为理想的方法. Objective To compare film microscopy and gram staining microscopic inspection in the diagnose bacterial vaginosis (BV). Methods Collected 406 cases of BV fast blue reagent to detect positive outpatient gynecologic patients in the vaginal secretion. The 406 cases were tested simultaneously microscopic clue cells on wet microscope. Among 406 cases, 210 cases of specimens were selectedrandomly to examine microscopic clue cells after Gram stain. The examine microscopic clue cells was ≥20% that would be considered as consistant with the judgment standardize. Those samles came up to positive coincidence of BV fast blue reagent. Results 243 samples consisted with the jugment standard in the 406 film microscopy samples; 127 samples consisted with the jugment standard in the 210 Gram staining microscopic inspection samples. The comparison be- tween wet film microscopy and Gram staining microscopic inspection with BV fast blue reagent method,which two consis- tence rate were respectively 59.85 %and 60.48%, the statistical results showed that X2= 0. 22, v= 1, P= 0. 881 had no sig- nificant difference. Conclusion The experiment find that there was not significant difference between wet film and Gram staining microscopic examination of clue cell method. The wet film microscopic examination of clue cell maybe a better meth- od to diagnose bacterial vaginosi.
出处 《现代检验医学杂志》 CAS 2013年第4期106-107,共2页 Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine
关键词 线索细胞 镜检法 细菌性阴道病 clue cell microscopic examination bacterial vaginosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献25

  • 1周云晓,何琛俊.唾液酸酶检测法在细菌性阴道病中的诊断价值[J].浙江预防医学,2005,17(2):9-10. 被引量:5
  • 2李小平,彭小云,刘小三,陈学惠,龙尧,李佳.细菌性阴道病感染情况及疗效观察[J].医学临床研究,2005,22(5):672-673. 被引量:2
  • 3张莉.细菌性阴道病快速检测法的临床应用评价[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2006,5(11):1759-1759. 被引量:6
  • 4宋绍业 农少云.纸片法胺试验检测加德钠菌.中华检验医学杂志,2000,23(5):293-293.
  • 5[1]Huller SL.Association between bacterial vaginosis and prêterm delivery of a low-birth-weight infant[J].New England J Med,1995,333:1737-1742.
  • 6夏曙华,杨正安,吴延先,等.妇科门诊细菌性阴道病的调查[J].贵阳医学院报,2001,1(25):82.
  • 7Gravett MG, Nelsen HP. Independent associations of bacterial vaginosis and trachomatis infection with adverse pregnancy outcome[J]. JAMA, 1986,256 : 1899-1902.
  • 8Amsel R, Totten PA, Spiegal CA, et al. Nonspecific vaginitis: diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations[J]. Am J Med, 1983,74 : 14-21.
  • 9Simoes JA, Discacciati MG, Brolazo EM,et al. Clinical diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis[J].Inter J Gynecol Obstet, 2006,94(1) :28-32.
  • 10Damien SI,Valrie D,Franoise LG,et al. The role of bacterial vaginosis in preterm labor and preterm birth..a case- control study [J]. Euro J Obstet Gyneeol Reprod Biol, 2002,101(1) :41-46.

共引文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部