期刊文献+

科技数据管理与共享服务效果评价研究探索 被引量:5

Searching after Estimate of S & T Data Management and Sharing Service Ef-fect
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用文献调研和专家访谈等方式,深入研究科技数据资源后评估方法和机制,通过借鉴国际上科技项目管理后评估模式以及国内科技数据资源建设和服务后评估实践,提出科技数据应用服务效果评价指标选择的基本原则和内容框架。期待通过制定完善的数据服务效果评价体系及有效的实施方案,提高科技数据建设与运行管理的规范性、公正性和科学性,推进数据资源检索和服务的持续发展,提升科技数据的集成和共享水平。 Objective evaluation of scientiifc data sharing service and application beneifts has become an important part of continuous construction and healthy development of data resources. We use literature research and expert interviews, studying the post-evaluation’s methods and mechanisms of scientific data resources. By drawing on international science and technology project management’s post-evaluation pattern and domestic data resources construction and service’s evaluation practice, We present the basic principles of evaluation index selection and content framework of scientific data service evaluation. Through the perfect evaluation system and effective implementation programs, we are looking forward to improving scientific data construction and management’s normalization, impartiality and scientiifcity, promoting the sustainable development of data resources and enhancing the level of data integration and sharing.
出处 《中国科技资源导刊》 2013年第4期12-17,64,共7页 China Science & Technology Resources Review
基金 中国科学院信息化专项项目“科技数据共享应用机制与效益评估研究”(XXH12510-02)。
关键词 科技数据 共享服务 资源共享 服务评价 后评估 scientiifc data sharing service resources sharing service evaluation post-evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1丁娜,王坚,赵霞,李莎.中国科研项目后评估发展现状[J].科技信息,2010(33). 被引量:6
  • 2National Science Foundation. FY2006 Performance and Accountability Report [R]. 2006.
  • 3National Science Foundation. National Science Foun- dation's GPRA Strategic Plan for Finical Years 1997 -2003[R]. 1997.
  • 4NIH Overview-How NIH Research Has Benefited the Nation [EB/OL]. [2007-06-19]. http://www.nih.gov/ about/NIHoverview.html.
  • 5颜敏.美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)绩效管理研究[J].医学信息学杂志,2009,30(6):38-41. 被引量:7
  • 6Research Councils UK (RCUK). Research Councils UK's Updated Position Statement on Access to Re- search Outputs [EB/OL]. [2013-03-05]. http://www. rcuk.ac.uk/access/Pages/Accessibility.aspx.
  • 7孟激,刘智渊.英国研究理事会绩效管理与评估[J].中国科学基金,2009,23(4):247-252. 被引量:12
  • 8Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs. Knowledge and Innovation: A Statement on Research and Research Training[EB/OL]. [2013-04-05]. http:// www.detya.gov.au/archive/highered/whitepaper.
  • 9龚旭.澳大利亚科技政策研究与战略制定的范例分析[J].研究与发展管理,2004,16(2):26-32. 被引量:9
  • 10科技部.国家科技基础条件平台运行服务绩效考核指标[EB/OL].[2013-04-15].http://www.most.gov.cn/fggw/zfwj/zfwj20l1/201108R20110805-88853.htm.

二级参考文献62

共引文献47

同被引文献46

  • 1徐林明,李美娟.动态综合评价中的数据预处理方法研究[J].中国管理科学,2020,0(1):162-169. 被引量:47
  • 2董诚,赵伟,涂勇.我国科学数据机构共享绩效评估研究[J].中国科技论坛,2007(8):74-78. 被引量:23
  • 3王雪梅.科技成果转化与科技进步贡献关系研究[D].北京:北京工业大学,2012:30-35.
  • 4National Science Foundation. National Science Foun- dation's GPRA Strategic Plan for Finical Years 1997 -2003[R]. 1997.
  • 5Research Councils UK (RCUK). Research Councils UK's Updated Position Statement on Access to Re- search Outputs[EB/OL]. [2013-03-05]. http://www. rcuk.ac.uk/access/Pages/Accessibility.aspx.
  • 6Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs. Knowledge and Innovation: A Statement on Research and Research Training[EB/OL]. [2013-04-05]. http:// www.detya.gov.au/archive/highered/whitepaper, 1999.
  • 7CAF-Common Assessment Framework[EB/OL]. [2014-01-05]. http://www.eipa.eu/en/topic/show/ &tid =191.
  • 8科技部.国家科技基础条件平命运行服务绩效考核指标[EB/OL].[2013-04-15].http://www.most.gov.cn/fggw/zfwj/zfwj2011/201108/t20110805-88853.htm.
  • 9朱迎春.基于无形资本测算的科技进步贡献率[N]科技日报,2012.
  • 10郭亚军,易平涛.线性无量纲化方法的性质分析[J].统计研究,2008,25(2):93-100. 被引量:204

引证文献5

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部