期刊文献+

The calibration methods for Multi-Filter Rotating Shadowband Radiometer: a review 被引量:1

The calibration methods for Multi-Filter Rotating Shadowband Radiometer: a review
原文传递
导出
摘要 The continuous, over two-decade data record from the Multi-Filter Rotating Shadowband Radiometer (MFRSR) is ideal for climate research which requires timely and accurate information of important atmospheric components such as gases, aerosols, and clouds. Except for parameters derived from MFRSR measurement ratios, which are not impacted by calibration error, most applications require accurate calibration factor(s), angular correction, and spectral response function(s) from calibration. Although a laboratory lamp (or reference) calibration can provide all the information needed to convert the instrument readings to actual radiation, in situ calibration methods are implemented routinely (daily) to fill the gaps between lamp calibrations. In this paper, the basic structure and the data collection and pretreatment of the MFRSR are described. The laboratory lamp calibration and its limita- tions are summarized. The cloud screening algorithms for MFRSR data are presented. The in situ calibration methods, the standard Langley method and its variants, the ratio-Langley method, the general method, Alexandrov's comprehensive method, and Chen's multi-channel method, are outlined. The reason that all these methods do not fit for all situations is that they assume some properties, such as aerosol optical depth (AOD), total optical depth (TOD), precipitable water vapor (PWV), effective size of aerosol particles, or angstrom coefficient, are invariant over time. These properties are not universal and some of them rarely happen. In practice, daily calibration factors derived from these methods should be smoothed to restrain elTor. The continuous, over two-decade data record from the Multi-Filter Rotating Shadowband Radiometer (MFRSR) is ideal for climate research which requires timely and accurate information of important atmospheric components such as gases, aerosols, and clouds. Except for parameters derived from MFRSR measurement ratios, which are not impacted by calibration error, most applications require accurate calibration factor(s), angular correction, and spectral response function(s) from calibration. Although a laboratory lamp (or reference) calibration can provide all the information needed to convert the instrument readings to actual radiation, in situ calibration methods are implemented routinely (daily) to fill the gaps between lamp calibrations. In this paper, the basic structure and the data collection and pretreatment of the MFRSR are described. The laboratory lamp calibration and its limita- tions are summarized. The cloud screening algorithms for MFRSR data are presented. The in situ calibration methods, the standard Langley method and its variants, the ratio-Langley method, the general method, Alexandrov's comprehensive method, and Chen's multi-channel method, are outlined. The reason that all these methods do not fit for all situations is that they assume some properties, such as aerosol optical depth (AOD), total optical depth (TOD), precipitable water vapor (PWV), effective size of aerosol particles, or angstrom coefficient, are invariant over time. These properties are not universal and some of them rarely happen. In practice, daily calibration factors derived from these methods should be smoothed to restrain elTor.
出处 《Frontiers of Earth Science》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2013年第3期257-270,共14页 地球科学前沿(英文版)
关键词 Multi-Filter Rotating Shadowband Radiometer (MFRSR) CALIBRATION REVIEW Multi-Filter Rotating Shadowband Radiometer (MFRSR), calibration, review
  • 相关文献

参考文献91

  • 1Ackerman T P, Stokes G (2003). The atmospheric radiation measure?ment program. Phys Today, 56(1): 38-45.
  • 2Alexandrov, D, Kiedron P, Michalsky J J, Godges G, Flynn C J, Lacis A A (2007). Optical depth measurements by shadow-band radiometers and their uncertainties. Appl Opt, 46(33): 8027-8038.
  • 3Alexandrov M D, Lacis A A, Carlson B E, Cairns B (2002). Remote sensing of atmospheric aerosols and trace gases by means of multi?filter rotating shadowband radiometer. part I: retrieval algorithm. J Atmos Sci, 59(3): 524-543.
  • 4Alexandrov M D, Lacis A A, Carlson B E, Cairns B (2002b). Remote sensing of atmospheric aerosols and trace gases by means of multi?filter rotating shadowband radiometer. part II: climatological applications. J Atmos Sci, 59(3): 544-566.
  • 5Alexandrov M D, Lacis A A, Carlson B E, Cairns B (2008). Characterization of atmospheric aerosols using MFRSR measure?ments. J Geophys Res, 113(D8): D08204.
  • 6Alexandrov M D, Marshak A, Cairns B, Lacis A A, Carlson B E (2004). Automated cloud screening algorithm for MFRSR data. Geophys Res Lett, 31(4): L04118.
  • 7Alexandrov M D, Schmid B, Turner D D, Cairns B, Oinas V, Lacis A A, Gutman S I, Westwater E R, Smirnov A, Eilers J (2009). Columnar water vapor retrievals from multifilter rotating shadowband radio?meter data. J Geophys Res, 114(D2): D02306.
  • 8Augustine J A, Cornwall C R, Hodges G B, Long C N, Medina C I, DeLuisi J J (2003). An automated method ofMFRSR calibration for aerosol optical depth analysis with application to an Asian dust outbreak over the United States. J Appl Meteorol, 42(2): 266-278.
  • 9Augustine J A, Hodges G B, Cornwall C R, Michalsky J J, Medina C I (2005). An update on SURFRAD - The GCOS Surface Radiation budget network for the continental United States. J Atmos Ocean Technol, 22(10): 1460-1472.
  • 10Bais A F (1997). Spectrometers: operational errors and uncertainties, Solar Ultraviolet Radiation Modeling, Measurements and Effects. In: Zerefos C S, Bais A F, eds .Vol. 52 of NATO ASI Series I, Global Environmental Change. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 163-173.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部