期刊文献+

人文社会科学研究评价程序公正探讨 被引量:7

Research on Humanities and Social Science Research Evaluation Porcedure Justice
下载PDF
导出
摘要 人文社会科学研究评价离不开相应的程序,公正的评价程序是开展人文社会科学研究评价的前提与基础。文章在分析程序公正内涵的基础上,提出了人文社会科学研究评价程序公正的含义,并探讨了人文社会科学研究评价程序公正的价值。公正的人文社会科学研究评价程序的最低限度标准是:主体平等、实质参与、价值中立、程序理性、程序公开和程序自治。为实现人文社会科学研究评价程序公正,需要明确人文社会科学研究评价主体职能,激发人文社会科学研究评价主体道德自觉,完善人文社会科学研究评价指标体系,加强人文社会科学研究评价制度建设,优化人文社会科学研究评价实施流程,保障人文社会科学研究评价主体参与。 Humanities and social science research evaluation can not be separated from the corresponding pro- cedure, and the justifiable evaluation procedure is the premise and foundation of the implementing of humanities and social science research. Based on the analysis of the connotation of procdure justice, the connotation of human- ities and social science research evaluation procedure justice is raised, and the values of humanities and social sci- ence evaluation procedure justice are discussed. The minimum standards of humanities and social science evalua- tion procedure justice are: equal subjects, real participation, value-neutral, rational procedure, public procedure and autonomous procedure. In order to realize the humanities and social science evaluation procedure justice, the humanities and social science research evaluation subjects' functions should be clarified, the humanities and social science research evaluation subjects' moral consciousness should be stimulated, the humanities and social science research evaluation index system should be perfected, the the humanities and social science research evaluation sys- tem should be strengthened, the humanities and social science research evaluation implementing procedure should be optimized, and the the humanities and social science research evaluation subjects' participations should be guaranteed.
作者 谭春辉
出处 《重庆大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第5期93-99,共7页 Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition)
基金 国家社会科学基金一般项目"以创新和质量为导向的人文社会科学研究评价机制及其实施体系研究"(12BTQ036) 2011年度教育部人文社会科学研究专项任务项目(科研诚信和学风建设)"高校人文社会科学科研成果评价机制研究"(11JDXF005)
关键词 人文社会科学研究评价 评价程序 程序公正 评价主体 humanities and social science research evaluation evaluation procedure procedure justice evaluation subject
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1戴维·米勒.社会正义原则[M].应奇译.南京:江苏人民出版社,2002.P102.
  • 2林晓婉,车宏生,张鹏,王蕾.程序公正及其心理机制[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(2):264-272. 被引量:34
  • 3THIBAUT J, WALKER L. Procedural justice:A psychologi- cal analysis [ M ]. Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum. 1975 : 8 - 9.
  • 4LEVENTHAL G S, KARUZA J, FRY W R. What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships [ C]//Gergen K, Greenberg M. Willis R. Social exchange. New York: Plenum Press, 1980:27 - 55.
  • 5LEVENTHAL G S, KARUZA J, FRY W R. Beyond Fair- ness : A Theory of Allocation Preference [ C ]//G Mikula. Jus- tice and Social Interaction: experimental and theoretical con- tributions, from psychological research. New York : Springer - Verlag, 1980 : 167 - 218.
  • 6PETERSON P M, GREEN A, CARY J. The measurement of organizational justice in organization: a reliability, validity and context - sensitivity assessment [ J ]. Journal of Occupa- tional and Organizational Psychology, 2002, 75 ( 4 ) : 393 - 405.
  • 7ZAPATA-PHELAN C P, COLQUIT'F J A, SCOTT B A, LIVINGSTON B. Procedural Justice, Interactional Justice, and Task Performance : The Mediating Role of Intrinsic Moti-vation [ J ]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2009,108 ( 1 ) :93 - 105.
  • 8李昌盛,王彪.“程序公正感受”研究及其启示[J].河北法学,2012,30(3):60-68. 被引量:26
  • 9KIM W C, MAUBORGNE R A. Procedural Justice, Atti- tudes, and Subsidiary Top Management Compliance with Multinationals'Corporate Strategic Decisions [ J ]. Academy of Management Journal, 1993,36:502 - 526.
  • 10邱均平,谭春辉,任全娥.人文社会科学研究评价的理论与实践(上)[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2012:118-119.

二级参考文献93

  • 1[英]哈耶克.《通往奴役之路》,王明毅等译,北京:中国社会科学出版社,1997年,第222页.
  • 2季卫东.《法治秩序的构建》,北京:中国政法大学出版社,1999年版,第87-144页.
  • 3[21]Earley P C, Kanfer R. The influence of component participation and role models on goal acceptance, goal satisfaction and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1985, 36: 378~390
  • 4[22]Doll W J, Torkzadeh G. The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction. MIS Quarterly, 1988, 12: 258~274
  • 5[23]Peterson R S. Can you have too much of a good thing? The limits of voice for improving satisfaction with leaders. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1999, 25(3): 313~324
  • 6[24]Avery D R, Quinones M A. Disentangling the effects of voice: the incremental roles of opportunity, behavior, and instrumentality in predicting procedural fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2002, 87(1): 81~86
  • 7[25]Lind E A, Tyler T R. The social psychology of procedure justice. New York: Plenum Press, 1988
  • 8[26]Lind E A, Earley P C. Procedural justice and culture. International Journal of Psychology, 1992, 27(2): 227~242
  • 9[27]Greenberg J. The distributive justice of organizational performance evaluations. In: Bierhoff H W, Cohen R L, Greenberg J ed. Justice in Social Relations. New York: Plenum, 1986. 337~351
  • 10[28]Lind E A, Tyler T R, Huo Y J. Procedural context and culture, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997, 73(4): 767~780

共引文献63

同被引文献240

引证文献7

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部