期刊文献+

基于不同状态方程压缩因子的煤吸附CO_2等温线的比较 被引量:5

Comparison of CO_2 adsorption isotherms on coals based on compressibility factor from different equation of state
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了考察不同状态方程对CO2吸附量测定的影响,通过比较3种通用气体方程和3种CO2经验状态方程计算所得CO2压缩因子,进而利用3个煤样研究6种状态方程所得的CO2吸附值。结果表明:状态方程对Gibbs吸附量的影响在平衡压力不高于6MPa时较小,而在中高压力条件下较大,且随平衡压力增加该影响增大。研究表明:中高压条件下不同状态方程所获得吸附量的差异主要通过6~12MPa吸附增量的变化而引起,低压和高压条件下状态方程对吸附增量影响较小。状态方程对吸附量的影响不仅取决于计算CO2压缩因子所采用的状态方程,而且取决于参比缸和自由空间的容积。 To know the effect of Equation of state (EoS) on CO2 adsorption measurement, CO2 compressibility factors calculated from three universal EoSs and three empirical EoSs for CO2 were compared, then three coal samples were used to investigate CO2 adsorptions obtained from the six EoSs. The results show that the EoSs have less effect on CO2 Gibbs adsorption at equilibrium pressure less than 6 MPa, while the effect is great at middle-high pressure and increases with increasing equilibrium pressure. The research suggests that the adsorption difference among various EoSs at middle-high pressure is caused by the adsorption increment at pressures of 6-12 MPa. The effect of EoS on the adsorption increment is small at low and high pressure. The effect of EoS on adsorption not only depends on the EoS used to calculate compressibility factor of CO2 and also on the volume of reference cell and free volume of sample cell.
出处 《煤炭学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第8期1411-1417,共7页 Journal of China Coal Society
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51174127) 山东省自然科学基金资助项目(ZR2011DM005) 矿山灾害预防控制教育部重点实验室(山东科技大学)资助项目(MDPC0806)
关键词 状态方程 压缩因子 CO2 吸附 高压 equation of state compressibility factor CO2 adsorption coal high pressure
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1周军平,鲜学福,李晓红,姜德义,姜永东.CO_2/CH_4在狭缝型孔内竞争吸附的分子模拟[J].煤炭学报,2010,35(9):1512-1517. 被引量:10
  • 2White C M, Smith D H, Jones K L, et aI. Sequestration of carbon di- oxide in coal with enhanced coalbed methane recovery-A review[ J]. Energy & Fuels ,2005,19 ( 3 ) :659-724.
  • 3张松航,唐书恒,潘哲军,汤达祯,李忠诚,张静平.晋城无烟煤CO_2-ECBM数值模拟研究[J].煤炭学报,2011,36(10):1741-1747. 被引量:16
  • 4Fitzgerald J E, Pan Z, Sudibandriyo M, et al. Adsorption of methane, nitrogen, carbon dioxide and their mixtures on wet Tiffany coal J]. Fuel,2005,84 ( 18 ) :2351-2363.
  • 5Krooss B M, van Bergen F, Gensterblum Y, et al. High-pressure met- hane and carbon dioxide adsorption on dry and moisture-equilibrated Pennsylvanian coals [ J ]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2002,51 (2) :69-92.
  • 6Ottiger S, Pini R, Storti G, et al. Competitive adsorption equilibria of CO2 and CH4 on a dry coal [ J ] Adsorption, 2008,14 ( 4-5 ) : 539- 556.
  • 7Siemons N, Busch A. Measurement and interpretation of supercritical CO2 sorption on various coals [ J ]. International Journal of Coal Geol- ogy, 2007,69 ( 4 ) : 229- 242.
  • 8Goodman A L, Busch A, Duffy G J, et al. An inter-laboratory compar- ison of CO2 isotherms measured on Argonne Premium coal samples [J]. Energy & Fuels,2004,18(4) :1175-1182.
  • 9Goodman A L, Busch A, Bustin R M, et al. Inter-laboratory compari- son II: CO2 isotherms measured on moisture-equilibrated Argonne premium coals at 55 C and up to 15 MPa[ J]. International Journal of Coal Geology ,2007,72 (3-4) : 153-164.
  • 10Gensterblum Y,van Hemert P, Billemont P, et al. European inter- laboratory comparison of high pressure CO2 sorption isotherms II: Natural coals[ J ]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2010,84 (2) :115-124.

二级参考文献45

共引文献49

同被引文献83

引证文献5

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部