期刊文献+

中国发电行业生命周期温室气体减排潜力及成本分析 被引量:10

Analysis of Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Potential and Cost for China's Power Generation Sector
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于相关规划目标,分析2020年中国发电行业8类减排发电技术的生命周期温室气体减排潜力、减排成本和单位减排成本。结果表明:1)发电行业共能产生2099.0~2070.3 MtCO2e的减排量,其中水电和核电的减排潜力最大,两者占总潜力的62.90%~63.34%;2)发电行业总减排成本为3307.6亿元,其中水电的发电成本最低,为783.0亿元,生物质发电的成本最高,为1687.5亿元;3)发电行业的平均单位减排成本为157.6~159.8元/tCO2e,其中水电和核电的单位减排成本最低,分别为104.3~104.8元/tCO2e和13.2~13.3元/tCO2e,天然气发电的最高,为958.8~1598.0元/tCO2e。总体而言,水电和核电的单位减排成本较低且减排潜力大,未来应重点发展这两种发电技术。 Based on the relevant planning objectives,life-cycle emission reduction capacities and costs of eight categories of emission reduction technology of China's power sector are analyzed.The results indicate that the total emission reduction capacity amounts to 2099.0–2070.3 MtCO2e.The emission reductions generated by hydropower and nuclear power are the biggest,accounting for 62.90% to 63.34% together.The total cost is projected to be 330.76 billion RMB.The lowest cost,by hydropower,is 783.0 billion RMB,while the highest,by biomass power,is 168.75 billion RMB.The average unit cost of reducing emissions is between 157.6 to 159.8 RMB/tCO2e.Hydropower and nuclear power have the lowest unit abatement costs,104.3– 104.8 RMB/tCO2e and 13.2–13.3 RMB/tCO2e respectively,while natural gas power has the highest,958.8–1598.0 RMB/tCO2e.Overall,the hydropower and nuclear power generate relatively low unit abatement costs and big emission reduction capacities.Thus,China should focus on the development of these two types of new energy in the future.
出处 《北京大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第5期885-891,共7页 Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目(10YJC790344)资助
关键词 生命周期评价 温室气体减排潜力 温室气体减排成本曲线 发电行业 life-cycle assessment greenhouse gas emission reduction potential greenhouse gas emission reduction cost curve power generation sector
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

二级参考文献262

共引文献743

同被引文献98

  • 1俞珠峰,陈贵峰,杨丽.中国洁净煤技术评价方法及评价模型CCTM[J].煤炭学报,2006,31(4):515-519. 被引量:26
  • 2刘强,姜克隽,胡秀莲.碳税和能源税情景下的中国电力清洁技术选择[J].中国电力,2006,39(9):19-23. 被引量:14
  • 3Joris Koornneef,Martin Junginger,André Faaij.Development of fluidized bed combustion—An overview of trends, performance and cost[J].Progress in Energy and Combustion Science.2006(1)
  • 4.中国拟在建电力项目信息(之一)[J].中国电力.2002(11)
  • 5Fanxian Yu,Jining Chen,Fu Sun,Siyu Zeng,Can Wang.Trend of technology innovation in China’s coal-fired electricity industry under resource and environmental constraints[J].Energy Policy.2010(3)
  • 6Machteld van den Broek,Ric Hoefnagels,Edward Rubin,Wim Turkenburg,André Faaij.Effects of technological learning on future cost and performance of power plants with CO 2 capture[J].Progress in Energy and Combustion Science.2009(6)
  • 7Wenjia Cai,Can Wang,Ke Wang,Ying Zhang,Jining Chen.Scenario analysis on CO 2 emissions reduction potential in China’s electricity sector[J].Energy Policy.2007(12)
  • 8Xin Lu,Zhufeng Yu,Lixin Wu,Jie Yu,Guifeng Chen,Maohong Fan.Policy study on development and utilization of clean coal technology in China[J].Fuel Processing Technology.2007(4)
  • 9Edward S. Rubin,Chao Chen,Anand B. Rao.Cost and performance of fossil fuel power plants with CO 2 capture and storage[J].Energy Policy.2007(9)
  • 10Wenjia Cai,Can Wang,Jining Chen,Ke Wang,Ying Zhang,Xuedu Lu.Comparison of CO 2 emission scenarios and mitigation opportunities in China’s five sectors in 2020[J]. Energy Policy . 2008 (3)

引证文献10

二级引证文献66

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部