期刊文献+

股权结构、上市状况和风险——来自中国商业银行的经验研究 被引量:14

Ownership Structure,Listed Status and Risk:Evidence from China’s Commercial Banks
下载PDF
导出
摘要 运用我国94家商业银行2001—2009年的数据,通过多元回归模型和方差分析研究商业银行股权结构、上市状况和风险的关系。研究发现:首先,外资商业银行比国有商业银行具有更好的资产质量、更低的信用风险以及更高的资本充足率,城市商业银行比国有商业银行具有更低的信用风险,股份制商业银行比国有商业银行具有更低的信用风险以及更低的资本充足率;其次,银行上市不仅提高商业银行的资产质量和资本充足率,同时降低了商业银行的信用风险;最后,研究还发现股权结构和风险的关系在上市银行和未上市银行存在显著差异,随后方差分析显示这是由于上市状况对股权结构和风险的关系存在显著的调节作用造成的。研究结论为我国商业银行改革提供一定的理论借鉴意义。 Ownership reform and listing are important issues in the banking industry in China, and play important roles in the recent development of the banking industry. Ownership structure fundamentally determines the corporate governance mechanisms and behavior choices, thus affecting bank performance and risk. However, previous research of ownership structure concerning about Chinese banking industry has focused on the implications of ownership structure for banks' performance and efficiency. No research has been done about how the ownership structure affects risk is blank. Therefore, we propose the first question: How does the ownership structure affect risk in Chinese banking industry? Bank listing can change the ownership structure, but the implication of the former for bank risks is different from that of the latter. On the one hand, bank listing exposes the bank to more strict regulations, which will reduce bank risk. On the other hand, bank listing can help bank raises equity at a lower cost, which induces banks to invest in the high-risk projects, and increases bank risk. However, there has been no empirical research on how the listed status impacts bank risk. The existing research explores the implication of listed status for bank risks from the qualitative perspective. Therefore, we propose the second question: How does bank listing impact bank risk in Chinese financial environment? For this purpose, this paper investigates the relationships among ownership structure, listed status and risk based on the relevant data of China's 94 commercial banks from 2001 to 2009. First, we explore the effect of ownership structure and bank listing on the asset quality, credit risk and capital adequacy ratio by using regression analysis. Second, we split all banks into listed banks and unlisted banks, and then analyze the implication of ownership structure for asset quality, credit risk and capital adequacy ratio.. Finally, we research the moderating effect of listed status on the relationships among the ownership structure and asset quality, credit risk and capital adequacy ratio by using ANOVA. Three main results emerge. First, compared to the state-owned banks the foreign-owned commercial banks exhibit a better asset quality, lower credit risk, and higher capital adequacy ratio. The city commercial banks have lower credit risk, and the joint-stock commercial banks have lower credit risk and capital adequacy ratio. Second, bank listing improves asset quality and capital adequacy ratio, and reduces credit risk to a certain extent, indicating the regulatory reinforcement effect of bank listing plays a leading role in China's listed banks. Third, the relationship between ownership structure and risk is different among the different listed status samples. The ANOVA analysis result shows that the listed status significantly moderates the relationship between ownership structure and risk. In conclusion, this study provides theoretical implications for the commercial banks' reform in China.
作者 程茂勇 赵红
出处 《管理工程学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第3期11-19,26,共10页 Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71103139) 教育部人文社会科学研究资助项目(10YJC790392)
关键词 商业银行 股权结构 上市状况 风险 commercial bank ownership structure listed status risk
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1Berle AA, Means GC. The Modem Corporation and Private Property [ M]. Macmillan, New York, 1932.
  • 2Jensen MC, Meckling WH. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure [ J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, 3 (4) : 305 - 360.
  • 3Fama EF. Agency problems and the theory of the firm [ J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1980, 88 (2) : 288 - 307.
  • 4Shleifer A, Vishny RW. A survey of corporate governance [ J ]. Journal of Finance, 1997, 52(2) : 737 -783.
  • 5Micco A, Panizza U, Yanez M. Bank ownership and performance Does politics matter? [ J ]. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2007, 31(1): 219 -241.
  • 6Lensink R, Meeste A, Naaborg A. Bank efficiency and foreign ownership: Do good institutions matter? [ J]. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2008, 32 (5) : 834 - 844.
  • 7Berger AN, Hasan I, Zhou MM. Bank ownership and efficiency in China: What will happen in the world's largest nation? [ J ]. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2009, 33( 1 ) : 113 - 130.
  • 8Lin XC, Zhang Y. Bank ownership reform and bank performance in China [ J]. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2009, 33 ( 1 ) : 20 - 29.
  • 9Garcia-Marco T, Dolores Robles-Fernandez M. Risk-taking behavior and ownership in the banking industry: The Spanish evidence [ J 1. Journal of Economics and Business, 2008, 60 (4) : 332 -354.
  • 10Haw IM, Ho S, Hu B, et al. Concentrated control, institutions, and banking sector: an international study [ J ]. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2010, 34 (3) : 485 - 497.

二级参考文献91

共引文献152

同被引文献207

引证文献14

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部