期刊文献+

两级生产与需求不确定下供应链风险共担模型研究 被引量:27

Research on Risk Sharing Model in Supply Chain with Uncertainties in Two-level Yields and Demand
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究原材料生产、产成品生产以及市场需求不确定下供应链风险共担契约与模型。分析了独立无协调决策与集中决策下,供应链系统的生产与订购决策,证明了独立无协调决策下供应商与制造商之间存在的纳什均衡博弈降低了供应链利润。为了降低供应链主体面临的两级生产与需求不确定性的风险,构建了风险共担协调契约与模型,最后进行了算例分析。研究表明,不考虑两级生产与需求不确定性所进行的决策,使得供应链利润显著降低,说明研究两级生产与需求不确定下供应链运作问题具有重要意义;风险共担协调契约,可以减少两级生产与需求不确定性对供应链效益的影响,提高供应商生产的积极性,使得基于风险共担的供应链利润达到了集中决策供应链的利润水平,从而实现供应链系统的帕累托改进。 Supply chain coordination under uncertain environment has been the central theme for the majority of supply chain management researches in recent years. The existing literature mainly studies issues related to optimal operation and coordination in the supply chain with demand or supply uncertainty. It is thus worthwhile to further investigate supply chain members' coordination decisions in a two-echelon yields setting in which both two-echelon yields ( namely, the uncertainty in the production of raw materials and in the production of finished goods) and demand uncertainties are present. This paper studies the risk-sharing contract in the supply chain with uncertainties in two-level yields and demand. Firstly, this paper assumes that the supply chain consists of one supplier and one manufacturer as the research objects. Under the decentralized decision-making situations caused by the uncertainty of two-echelon yield and demand, a random game model is established with a random optimization model. We study the optimal order decision for the manufacturer and the optimal production decision for the supplier. We find that the existence of Nash equilibrium game between suppliers and manufacturers under the decentralized non-coordinated decision-making situation. We analyze the relationship between the rationality of the model and coordination of the supply chain through model, example analysis, and a comparative analysis of the decision-making without considering the uncertainty of the demand and production of the supply chains. We find out that the supplier ' s production quantity decision usually shows a linear relation with the manufacturer's order quantity under the environment of two-echelon yields and demand uncertainty. Supplier and manufacturer face the uncertainty of two-echelon yields and demand. To enable the supply chain to realize the profit of centralized decision-making, we introduce the risk sharing coordination parameters, and establish a cooperative game model of the risk sharing mechanisms given the uncertainty of the two-echelon yield and demand in supply chains. On the basis of model andexample analysis, the paper designs a risk-sharing coordination mechanism. Through the study, the following conclusions can be drawn: (1) The supply chain can produce more overall profit in the centralized decision-making condition than the decentralized one. Supplier's production enthuSiasme is higher under the condition of centralized decision-making pattern than the decentralize one. The risk-sharing contract can improve supplier's production enthusiasme. (2) With the uncertainty in two-echelon yield and demand, decisions consider the uncertainty in production and demand and can generate more profit than those that do not. The result reveals that the study on the decision-making process for the supply chain bears great significance. ( 3 ) The result reveals that the risk sharing coordination pact proposed by this paper can promote the supplier's production quantity of the raw material. Releasing the impact on the profit of supply chain by uncertainties of two-level yields and demand can contribute to the profit of the supply chain. The risk sharing contract can reach the profit level of the supply chain under the centralized decision making pattern in order to reach the Pareto improvement of the supply chain.
出处 《管理工程学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第3期156-163,共8页 Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management
基金 教育部人文社会科学青年基金资助项目(10YJC630150)
关键词 供应链管理 两级生产不确定 风险共担 随机博弈 Supply chain management Uncertainties in two-level yields Risk sharing Random game
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Gregory, A. D., Song, J. S., Paul, H.Z.. Managing an assemble-to-order system with returns [ J ]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2009, 11 ( 1 ) : 144 - 159.
  • 2Li, J. , WANG, Y.Z.. Supplier competition in decentralized assembly systems with price-sensitive and uncertain demand [ J ]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2010, 12 (1) : 93 - 101.
  • 3徐贤浩,邓晨,彭红霞.基于供应链金融的随机需求条件下的订货策略[J].中国管理科学,2011,19(2):63-70. 被引量:36
  • 4Cachon, G.P. , Larivicre, M. A.. Competing manufacturers in a retail supply chain : On contractual form and coordination [ J ]. Management Science, 2010, 56 (3) : 571 - 589.
  • 5周永务.随机需求下两层供应链协调的一个批量折扣模型[J].系统工程理论与实践,2006,26(7):25-32. 被引量:31
  • 6于春云,赵希男,彭艳东,潘德惠.不确定需求环境下多级库存系统优化与协调模型研究[J].管理工程学报,2009,23(1):121-127. 被引量:14
  • 7Rekik Y, Sahin E, Dallery Y. A comprehensive analysis of the newsvendor model with unreliable supply [ J ]. OR Spectrum, 2007, 29(2): 207 -233.
  • 8Keren B. The single-period inventory problem: Extension to random yield from the perspective of the supply chain [ J ]. Omega, 2009, 37:801 -810.
  • 9Weng Z K, McClurg T. Coordinated ordering decisions for short life cycle products with uncertainty in delivery time and demand [ J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2003, 151 ( 1 ) : 12 - 24.
  • 10Gurnani H, Gerchak Y. Coordination in decentralized assembly systems with uncertain component yield[ J ]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2007, 176: 1559- 1576.

二级参考文献105

  • 1金立印.服务供应链管理、顾客满意与企业绩效[J].中国管理科学,2006,14(2):100-106. 被引量:82
  • 2吴亮红,王耀南,周少武,袁小芳.采用非固定多段映射罚函数的非线性约束优化差分进化算法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2007,27(3):128-133. 被引量:27
  • 3刘强,陈新,陈新度,张平.应用服务提供商模式下应用服务定制的机理研究[J].计算机集成制造系统,2007,13(5):1035-1040. 被引量:6
  • 4Viswanathan S. Optimal strategy for the integrated vendor-buyer inventory model. European Journal of Operational Research, 1998, 105 : 38 - 42.
  • 5Abdul-Jalbar B, Gutierrez J, Sicilial J. Policies for inventory/ distribution systems : The effect centralization vs. decentralization[ J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2003, 81:281 - 293.
  • 6Forsberg R. Exact evaluation of (R, Q ) policies for two-level inventory systems with Poisson demand [ J ]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1996, 96 : 130 - 138.
  • 7Cachon GE. Exact evaluation of batch-ordering inventory policies in two-echelon supply chains with periodic review [ J ]. Operations Research, 2001, 49(1): 79-98.
  • 8Axsater S. Exact analysis of continuous review (R, Q) policies in two-echelon inventory systems with compound Poisson demand [ J]. Operations Research, 2000, 48(5) :686 - 696.
  • 9Chen F, Zheng YS. One-warehouse multi-retailer systems with centralized stock information[J] .Operations Research, 1997, 45(2) : 275 - 287.
  • 10Cheung K, Hausman W. An exact performance evaluation for supplier in a two-echelon inventory system[J]. Operations Research, 2000, 48(4) : 646 - 653.

共引文献165

同被引文献279

引证文献27

二级引证文献97

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部