2Campbell D F J.The evaluation of university research in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands,Germany and Austria[A].Shapira P,Kuhlmann S.Learning from Science and Technology Policy Evaluation[C].Edward Elgar,2003.98-131.
3Lyall C,Bruce A,Firn J,Firn M,tait J.Assessing end-use relevance of public sector research organizations[J].Research Policy,2004,33(1):73-87.
4Jordan G B,Streit D.Recognizing the competing values in science and technology organization:implications for evaluation[A].Shapira P,Kuhlmann S.Learning from Science and Technology Policy Evaluation[C].Edward Elgar,2003.316-338.
5Feller I.The academic policy analysis as reporter:the who,what and hoe of evaluating science and technology programs[A].Shapira P,Kuhlmann S.Learning from Science and Technology Policy Evaluation[C].Edward Elgar,2003.18-31.
6Checkland P B.Towards a system-based methodology for real-word problem solving[J].Journal of System Engineering,1972,(3):87-116.
7Bolton R,Gold J.Career management:matching the needs of individuals with the needs of organizations[J].Personnel Review,1994,23(1):6-24.
8Hsu J P,Yeo K Y.A systemic approach to re-engineer a Public Research Institute (PRI) for commercialization[J].International Journal of Project Management,1996,14(6):387-393.
9Jacobs B.Using Soft Systems Methodology for performance improvement and organizational change in the English National Health Service[J].Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management,2004,12(4):138-149.
10Chapman J.System failure:why governments must learn to think differently[M].Demos,London,2002.
