期刊文献+

工程项目地震损伤的鉴识调查方法

Investigation method for engineering project seismic damage forensic
原文传递
导出
摘要 基于一般工程鉴识原则,针对工程项目地震损伤鉴识,提出强调"证据—观点—证据"的地震损伤鉴识分析原则和具体的技术调查方法.为保障鉴识调查结论的有效性及"合法、客观、中立"的工程证据属性,建议了合法的鉴识调查程序和规范的鉴识报告形成过程. In this paper,forensic investigation method of engineering seismic damage were discussed basing on general engineering forensic principle.The analysis principles,which is evidence-view-evidence,and specific technical investigation methods of seismic damage forensic were also emphasized.To guarantee the effectiveness of the forensic investigation conclusion and the legal,objective and neutral evidence properties,legitimate forensic investigation procedure and normative forming process of forensic report were suggested.
出处 《福州大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第4期782-786,共5页 Journal of Fuzhou University(Natural Science Edition)
基金 福建省自然科学基金资助(2012J05104) 福建省教育厅科研资助项目(JK2012043) 厦门理工学院高层次人才资助项目(YKJ11018R)
关键词 地震 损伤 工程鉴识 鉴识证据 seismic damage engineering forensic forensic evidence
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Jenny J R. Guide to investigation of structural failures[ M]. New York: ASCE, 1979.
  • 2Chen S E, Young D. Benchmarking forensic engineering practice - a philosophical discussion [ C ]// Proceedings of the Fourth Forensic Engineering Congress. Cleveland : ASCE, 2006 : 22 - 32.
  • 3何家弘.司法鉴定导论[M].北京:法律出版社,2001.
  • 4Campbell P. Learning from construction failures: applied forensic engineering[ M ]. Caithness: Whittles Publishing, 2001.
  • 5Lewis G L. Guidelines of forensic engineering practices [ M ]. Reston: ASCE Pub, 2003.
  • 6Lin Li, Zhou Wei -dong, Fan Li - chu. The research on engineering judicial forensic system framework for the civil engineering risk management[ C]//The 1st International Conference on Sustainable Construction and Risk Management. Chongqing: [ s. n. ], 2010:77-83.
  • 7林立,范立础,卓卫东.“工程司法鉴识”制度架构研究[J].福建建筑,2010(4):132-134. 被引量:1
  • 8田平安.鉴定结论论[J].现代法学,2000,22(6):26-31. 被引量:12

二级参考文献5

  • 1Kevin L Rens, Oswald Rendon--Herrero, Paul A. Bosela. Forensic Engineering Proceedings of The First Congress [C]. Minneapolis: Kevin L Rens, 1997.
  • 2National Academy of Forensic Engineering[EB], http://www, nafe. org, 2005.
  • 3Delisle, Ronald Joseph. Evidence: Principles and Problems[C]. Toronto: Carswell, 1999.
  • 4谷口安平.程序的正义与诉讼[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1996.2.
  • 5胡志强.“灰色理论”与伤情鉴定[J].证据科学,1997,14(2):61-62. 被引量:6

共引文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部