摘要
抑制功能差是解释个体冲动性水平高的深层次原因,但两者是否具备一致性的关系还尚不清晰。使用巴瑞特(Barratt)冲动问卷中文版(BIS-11-C)从280名低年级大学生中筛选出22名作为冲动高组,22名作为冲动低组,通过行为反应实验和眼动追踪技术测查两组在色词Stroop和空间Stroop和抑制反眼跳任务上是否同样具有显著差异,结果表明冲动高组在三种任务上的成绩显著差于冲动低组,说明个体的冲动性水平与其抑制表现具有一致性。
Inhibition dysfunction is a deep-seated reasons to explain the high level of individual impulse, but whether they have the consistency of the relationship remain unclear. The Barrett Impulsiveness Scale in Chinese (BIS-11-C) have been used in this study to select 22 students as impulsive high group, and 22 students low from 280 to Freshmen. Traditional behavior ex- periments and eye-movement tracking technology test have been used together to check the difference from two groups in the Color Word Stroop and Spatial Stroop and inhibition of the anti-saccade task. Results show that there is a significant differ- ence between the two groups. The group of impulse high results in the three tasks was significantly worse than the impulse low. This indicates that impulsive behavior level of individuals and its inhibition performance have the consistency.
出处
《广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
北大核心
2013年第4期147-154,共8页
Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
冲动性
抑制
眼动追踪
impulsivity inhibition eye-movement tracking