摘要
目的气质性格量表修编(TCI—R)中文版的效度检验。方法规范引入TCI—R,经完全双盲互译及4次预实验形成TCI—R中文版,2899名大学生参加了TCI—R中文版的团体施测。结果项目分析:各维度各项目与其总分之间的相关系数,除RD1(0.28)和SD4(0.29)与其维度总分相关系数低于0.3外,全量表所有项目与其相应维度总分相关系数在0.35~0.62之间,差异有统计学意义。结构效度:采用主成分分析法进行因素分析,一16个特质因素共同度均在0.4以上(0.52~0.78)。RDl的共同度在0.4以下(0.39)。4个因子累积解释方差65.86%,4个因子方差解释在15.21%-17.78%之间。性格分量表3个因子(维度)的13个特质因素共同度和负荷,除C02和SD4外,13个特质因素共同度均在0.4以上(0.5l~0.67)。CO2的共同度为0.38;SD4的共同度为0.39。4个因子累积解释方差55.82%,且4个因子的方差解释比例基本相当,在17.35%至19.62%之间。效标关联效度:TCI—R各维度与各型人格障碍之间的相关系数为0.405~0.713,差异均有统计学意义。结论TCI—R中文版效度总体符合心理测量学要求,适用于中国大学生。
Objective To examined the validity of Chinese version of Temperament Character Inventory - revision (TCI - R) Methods The TCI - R were normally introduced, double - blindingly translated and pretested for four times before its Chinese formation. Based on which, a sample of 2 899 undergraduates were measured in groups. Results With respect to item analysis, 238 of all the 240 items had statistically significant coefficients ( ranged 0. 35 - 0. 62) with the total subscale score, with only 2 items lower than 0. 3 (0. 28 for RD1 and 0. 29 for SD4 ). As for exploratory factor analysis, the temperament factors, by inventory of TCI- R demonstrated four which 65.86% variances could be explained. The character inventory of TCI - R were tested to be four factors, by which 55.82% variances could be explained. For the criterion validity, the correlations between the dimensions of TCI- R and PDQC (as the criterion.) accorded with the theoretical assumption by Cloninger. Conclusion The validity of the Chinese version of TCI- R meets psychometrics requirements as a whole and thus is applicable for Chinese undergraduates.
出处
《预防医学情报杂志》
CAS
2013年第8期628-632,共5页
Journal of Preventive Medicine Information
基金
全国教育科学研究"十一五"规划研究项目(立项号:DCA080145)
深圳市教育科学"十一五"规划重点课题(立项号:A219)
深圳大学教学改革科研项目(立项号:4LN)