期刊文献+

检察机关非法取证行为调查核实权的正当程序完善——以《刑事诉讼法》和《人民检察院刑事诉讼规则(试行)》为视角

Perfecting the Procuratorate,s Right of Investigating and Checking Illegally Obtaining Evidence Behavior by Due Procedure ——Taking the Newly-amended Criminal Procedure Law and the People's Procuratorate Criminal Rules(Trial) as Angle
下载PDF
导出
摘要 检察机关对非法取证行为是否享有调查核实权一直是理论和实践中争论的热点问题。修改后的《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》对检察机关该项权力的确立,契合了检察机关的职能定位和司法实践的现实需要。但鉴于法律条文对简洁性和凝练性的内在要求,该规定难免失之原则与抽象。尽管修改后的《人民检察院刑事诉讼规则(试行)》细化了上述规定,但仍未能涵盖司法实践中可能遭遇的各种困境。应通过保障权力行使线索来源、科学界定两类不同权力行使对象以及健全权力行使法律效果等正当程序对检察机关的调查核实权予以完善。 Whether the procuratorate has the right of investigating and checking of illegally obtaining evidence is the hot topic in theory and practice.The Amendments to the Criminal Law of the PRC(the 8th Edition) confirmed the procuratorate,s right,which meets the realistic requirements of procuratorate,s functional position and judiciary practice.But in consideration of the internal requirements of simplicity and cohesion of legal articles,the regulation is hard to avoid principle and abstraction.The amended People,s Procuratorate,s Criminal Procedure Regulation(Trial) detailed the above-mentioned regulation,but it didn,t cover the difficulties that we may meet in judiciary practice.So the procuratorate,s right of investigating and checking should be perfected by protecting the power use,scientifically defining the two kinds of subjects of power use,establishing the effectiveness of power use and other due processes.
作者 张少波 刘青
出处 《贵州警官职业学院学报》 2013年第2期45-49,共5页 Journal of Guizhou Police Officer Vocational College
基金 广东省东莞市社会科学联合会科研项目(2012ZDB02)
关键词 非法取证 调查核实权 检察机关非法取证行为调查核实权 illegally obtaining evidence right of investigating and checking the procuratorate s right of investigating and checking illegally obtaining evidence
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献38

共引文献154

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部